is the best way to manage your money. Go there now »

Sign up or log in to mint.com

When Are You Old Enough For Your First Credit Card?

Share This

photo: rubenerd

Everyone has an opinion about credit cards.  They’re great and they’re terrible and they’re everything in between, depending on whom you ask.

But one thing is certain: we adults have always had the right to apply for, open and use credit cards as we saw fit so long as we were old enough to sign a contract, which we can do when we’re 18.  Thanks to some, we now no longer enjoy the privilege to make up our own minds on this matter.

Thanks to the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility Disclosure Act of 2009, or CARD Act, you can no longer open a credit card account until you’re 21 years old, unless you have a job or a co-signer.  This is the law of the land since February 22 of this year.

The question is, was this the right move?  How old should you have to be before you walk around with your very own credit card, no strings attached?  What exactly was accomplished?

I’ve always found these age-based “forced avoidance” rules somewhat humorous and extremely nonsensical, especially when there is no scientific basis for the age cutoff.

It’s a statistical fact that drivers are higher insurance risks when they’re younger than 25, so many rental companies won’t rent to people in that age group — or would rent under more expensive terms. That rule makes sense, because it saves rental car companies money. Stipulated!  But where is the evidence that supports that a 21-year old is a better manager of credit cards than an 18-, 19- or 20-year olds?  You can stop looking because it doesn’t exist.

What does exist is a mountain of evidence why this provision of the CARD Act not only doesn’t make any sense but also is, in fact, problematic.  Follow me…

“Avoidance” Doesn’t Equate to “Education”

I promise that no credit epiphany occurs at age 21.  I know plenty of credit savvy 21 years old and even more credit disasters pushing 50.  Proper credit management knows no age boundary yet someone felt it necessary to make you wait the three additional years to either be responsible or not.

There is also no new requirement to take a “Credit Cards 101” class in either high school or college, yet it’s hard to argue that it’s not more important than history, music, art, psychology or physical education.

Co-signing = BAD IDEA

This CARD Act actually allows a lender to issue you a credit card as long as your parent co-signs for you, regardless of your age or income.  What this means is both of you would now be equally liable for the debt and equally at risk for credit damage if the card is mismanaged in any way.

For example, if your parent runs up a balance on the card, your credit will suffer – and vice versa. If you think your parent is making the payments on time, and they aren’t, your credit will suffer — and vice versa.  If these things happen you (or your parent) won’t be able to simply change your mind about being on the account because the lender won’t let one of you jump off the liability train.

Lending 101 = Two liable parties is better than one liable party.

Additionally, if your parent has poor credit then you could very well be declined outright or saddled with adverse terms.  So, the penalty for being under 21 could be a 29% interest rate on your revolving balances, thanks to mom or dad.  And, because this is your initial interest rate, you can’t earn a better one by properly managing the account. The lender is under no obligation to adjust it downward, ever.

No, I think it’s safe to say that this was the legislative equivalent of “swing and a miss.”  I get the hypothesis; you restrict credit card usage by young people and you prevent them from getting into debt.  Nobody likes to see people in debt, let alone young people.  But this isn’t going to prevent that from happening.  It just delays it for three years.

John Ulzheimer is the President of Consumer Education at SmartCredit.com, the credit blogger for Mint.com, and the author of the “credit history” definition on Wikipedia.  He is an expert on credit reporting, credit scoring and identity theft. Formerly of FICO, Equifax and Credit.com, John is the only recognized credit expert who actually comes from the credit industry.  He has served as a credit expert witness in more than 70 cases and has been qualified to testify in both Federal and State court on the topic of consumer credit.

Related Videos

25 Comments so far

leave a comment
  1. Not sure about post!

  2. MikeTheRed

    What I find most disturbing is the trend to push more and more past the age of 18. At 18, you’re considered a legal adult, can go to war, can vote etc. But the list of things you can’t do because the government thinks you’re still too young seems to keep growing.

    This is getting ridiculous. Either you’re a full adult with all the rights, privileges and benefits implied, or you’re not. Saying you’re an adult, but not mature enough to handle a credit card wisely is just flat-out dumb. We’re trying to protect people from their own stupidity, and it’s doing nothing more than insulating them from reality, then dumping them rather unceremoniously into the thick of it at 21.

    The problem is just shifted, not solved.

  3. Good article, but cosigning isn’t always bad. My parents cosigned with me on my first credit card, but they have good credit, and they would pay all of my bills and I would pay them in turn. Of course it’s a bad idea if they have bad credit and are irresponsible, but if that’s not the case it’s actually one of the best and easiest ways to build credit when you have none.

  4. I think the idea was to stop credit card companies from poaching college students who are just out of high school. Although I agree there are no “epiphanies” that occur at age 21 there is still a lot of growing up and learning of personal responsibility that generally occurs during the first few years of college. I definitely see both sides of the argument though.

    • I’d like to second Clay. I worked at a sub shop across from a major university and 90% of our business, if not more, was college students. There were a couple of times a credit card company set up shop right outside, giving away coupons for a free sub to whoever signed up for a credit card. Inside, we laughed at all the saps who would fall for this.

  5. This legislation was needed and appreciated by US citizens — real flesh and blood people not “corporate persons”. Having a co-signer and/or a job for a line of credit just makes sense for ALL adults.

    The banks prey on young adults — particularly those in college to offer them credit which they KNOW will be backed by their responsible parents. Once they get hooked on credit, they are owned by the banking industry for the rest of their lives. That is exactly what the banking industry wants.

    I’m 100% debt free and even own my home outright but too many of my peers and their young adult kids are up to their neck in debt and may never get out.

  6. nethertether

    Here is a good scientific reason no one should be considered an adult until age 25 (for any reason-military, contractual, drinking age, etc.).

    Brain changes significantly after age 18, says Dartmouth research.,,not fully developed until about age 25.
    http://www.dartmouth.edu/~news/releases/2006/02/06.html

  7. MikeTheRed has a decent point about being a full adult with all the rights associated with it. This is my biggest problem with the drinking age being 21, even though I am now the ripe old age of 24.

    There is, however, no god given right to a credit card. Credit card companies are businesses, just like car rentals (mentioned in the article). Credit Card companies are certainly allowed to DENY you credit though. This whole thing would make more sense if it was the Lenders saying “nobody under 21″ for reasons of risk due to irresponsibility. The lender is running a business, and reserves the right to refuse its services to anyone it deems risky. If they deem 18-20 risky, that is their prerogative.

    Writing this into law seems a little silly, as yes, if you are “an adult” you should have the right to be fiscally independent.

    And just for a point of reference, I got my first credit card at 23. Living your life on cash, (and student loans), is a great way to make sure you are responsible with your money prior to having that responsibility. You physically cant spend what you don’t have. Then when you do get a card, paying off the balance every month is not a hard task as you have adapted to a spending style where you are not living outside your means.

  8. I love someone’s idea on Digg to change the age when someone can join the military or be sentenced to death so people would stop using those events as milestones.

  9. Part of the incentive for distributing everything across a few years isntead of dropping it all at one age is to ease people into adulthood, instead of just smashing them in the face with it and then being like “sort your shit out”

    Imagine on peoples 16th birthday, they were given there licence, passport, credit card, kicked outa there parents home, and declared a full adult(with every perceivable right). Could do, screw, spend, w/e they wanted…. how many people WOULDNT have serious damaged their lives….

    Article also failed in the second paragraph and for this reason “unless you have a job or a co-signer.” A credit cards not a right, its a privilege…. If you dont have a job, you should not have a credit card.

    • Amen, too back my comments got kicked but I agree.

      This biased article fails.

      No job = No need to increase the overall debt of the world.

  10. Seems to me that the last sentence of this article is the strongest arguement against the article’s (author’s) position. Doesn’t it seem to be a good idea to delay possible credit failure/debt/disaster for 3 years?

  11. Its a new law designed to protect people, but who is it really protecting? Since lowering the voting age to 18, this country seems to have had a disconnect about what constitutes an adult. It ought to be rectified.

  12. egaiii

    My father applied and co-signed an AMEX credit card for me as soon as I received my SS number after I was born. A few years later when I was only a few years old and had a couple years of credit under my belt…he opened another AMEX credit card exclusively under my name. He would charge things to both of them from time to time and keep both in good standing. When I turned 15yrs old he cancelled the co-signed card and gave me the other one for emergencies. I’ve been using plastic almost exclusively since I was 15, and now I’m a 30yr old with perfect credit (and a 30yr old credit report).

  13. like a lot of things, driving, voting, and to a lesser extent drinking(at least i think) age is a terrible but convenient way of deciding when someone can do something.

    There are 10 ten olds who would use credit cards more responsibly then many 30 year olds.

  14. Here is why this biased story is wrong:

    1. If a 18 year old CAN be responsible, then why can’t cosigning be good? Make up your mind.

    2. I don’t think my parents from the 60s needed credit, why should a teenager now?

    3. I’m sorry, but if a teenager doesn’t have a job, they don’t need a credit card. Banks should not loan money to those who can not pay. It is just sad that one would consider this fair in today’s age. This is the same as the insurance industry won’t insure someone facing preexisting, impending illnesses.

    Maybe banks should improve their service instead of preying on financial idiots.

    I’m tired of the unwashed masses fucking up things for the rest of us i.e. mortgage crisis, frivolous lawsuits etc. etc. If we need laws for the morons to parent properly, then so be it.

    PS – Commenting on this site is badly broken.

  15. What a ridiculous story! Is this author advocating having unemployed 18-20 year olds open a line of revolving credit? Seriously?

    There is a single legitimate use of revolving credit – acquiring assets that appreciate at a higher rate than your credit terms. Outside of that it’s all a scam. If an unemployed 18-20 year old has an opportunity to acquire assets that appreciate that quickly…. wait a minute that’s just not going to happen. Hell it won’t happen for 99.9% of all Americans, so why is this even an issue? Protecting this group of Americans from making a time sensitive mistake (those extra 3 years of interest really add up) benefits us all.

  16. Problem number 1: this is her third child, and she’s only 21. I don’t think social worker supervision is going to be enough for this “mom”. Take the baby away and let a loving family adopt!

  17. I believe that this chases a large portion of predatory creditors from college campuses, which is where many inexperienced borrowers first get themselves into trouble . …good move in my book!

  18. Le_Chimp

    With the release of VISA debit cards these rules are fine imo.
    my parents signed a credit card for me when i was 16. not because I wanted credit but because I need a credit card to buy things at places that didn’t take cash, e.g. the internet.

    now with debit cards this is no longer a reason to have a credit card. simply put no job means you shouldn’t have a credit card.

    Honestly this shouldn’t need to be law but it’s to stop banks giving people more credit then they can afford then taking everything they own and making them pay monthly instalments of everything they get. It has nothing to do with the stupid youth racking up debts but to stop banks. In short age has nothing to do with this i think the law should be no credit should be given out to people with out the income to pay it off regardless of age.

    • Re: the internet

      Heh, exactly the same reason I got a credit card at 18. Never once had a late payment mind you, but I actually would have preferred a debit card at the time. Unfortunately, they weren’t very popular.

  19. Clay Boggess

    It doesn’t matter what your age is. You shouldn’t have a credit card unless you can demonstrate that you can hold down a job. What’s more important than age is the ability to demonstrate fiscal responsibility.

  20. Despite having a credit card a 18, I generally do agree with the law. However, there is no reason to exclude teens from having a DEBIT or otherwise prepaid card — there should be no age limit for opening a bank account. There’s no reason to exclude financial education at some arbitrary age limit; it’s those people that have a credit card before having a checking account that I’m worried about.

  21. Kerala

    Here is a good scientific reason no one should be considered an adult until age 25 (for any reason-military, contractual, drinking age, etc.).