How Long Can You be Sued for a Bad Debt?

Share This
The world of credit is a complicated and acronym-filled jungle. In fact, the first person who can successfully decipher these credit related acronyms will officially be conferred the title, “credit acronym expert.” Please use the comments section below for your answers.
Here goes…FCRA, FACTA, AA, FACS, CROA, DSCPA, FICO, SOL, EFX, CRA, CRO, RMCR, CDIA, FDCPA, TILA, ECOA, TU, XPN, and DPD. I’ll reveal the answers in my next Mint.com article. I’ll even give you one just to show you I’m a nice guy…SOL means “Statute of Limitations” and it’s the subject of this article.
“Statute of limitations” refers to the amount of time that can pass after some sort of event before legal actions regarding that event can no longer be initiated. So for example, in the credit world, if you incurred some sort of contractual debt in the state of California and defaulted, you can’t be sued for collection after 4 years. After the statue of limitations has expired that debt becomes a “time barred debt,” meaning the lender’s ability to sue you for collection has passed.
Now, don’t get me wrong: I’m not talking about the amount of time it can be reported to the credit bureaus and I’m not talking about the amount of time the lender or collection agency has to collect on the debt. “Time barred” just refers to when the court loses the ability to legally force you to pay.
Here’s the straight info on time barred contract debts:
|
If you lived in this state when you incurred the contract debt… |
…then this is how many years the collector has to sue you. |
|
Washington, D.C., DE, MD, MS, NC, NH, SC |
3 |
|
CA, PA, TX |
4 |
|
FL, ID, NE, OK, RI, VA |
5 |
|
AL, AK, AZ, AR, CO, CT, GA, HI, KS, ME, MA, MI, MN, NV, NJ, NM, NY, ND, OR, SD, TN, UT, VT, WA, WI |
6 |
|
MT |
8 |
|
IL, IN, IA, LA, MO, WV, WY |
10 |
|
KY, OH |
15 |
It’s important to point out that where you lived when you incurred the debt may take precedence over where you currently live. “Generally speaking, the statute of limitations of the state where the contract was formed will control if the contract is silent on the issue,” says Sean P. Flynn, Esq., a shareholder with Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, PC, a law firm that represents defendants in Fair Debt Collection and Fair Credit Reporting litigation in California and New York.
If you signed a contract with a bank while you lived in Mississippi but then moved to Ohio then the statute of limitations could be based on Mississippi law. And that’s good news because you can be sued for only 3 years in Mississippi versus 15 years in Ohio.
Here’s the straight info on how long defaulted debts can be reported to the credit reporting agencies. It’s pretty simple:
|
The State You Lived in When You Incurred the Debt |
The Number of Years a Creditor or Collector Can Credit Report the Item |
|
All 50, plus DC |
7 |
When Do You Not Pay Your Bill?
If the collector can’t sue you for payment any longer then do you really need to pay the debt? I would argue that you should always pay your obligations as long as you’re really the one who owes it. And, just because they can’t sue you it doesn’t mean they can’t report it to the credit bureaus. Having a paid-off debt is better than having an unpaid debt. In fact, some creditors will require that you pay off collections before they’ll do business with you, regardless of your credit scores or the age of the debt.
Will Creditors Really Sue Me for Non-Payment?
The short answer is “yes.” The better answer is “If you owe a creditor more than $1,000 in defaulted debt and you’re ignoring them, then you stand the risk of being sued.”
The higher the dollar amount, the better (or worse) your odds of getting sued. A fantastic proxy for “collection aggression” is the number of FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) and FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act) lawsuits filed against collectors and creditors for illegally attempting to collect debts and reporting of those debts to consumer credit reports. According to Jack Gordon, President of Michigan based WebRecon, a company that tracks FDCPA and FCRA lawsuits, “there were 12,213 FDCPA and FCRA lawsuits filed in 2010. That’s a record number.”
What this means is collectors were very aggressive in 2010 and there’s really nothing to indicate that they’ll calm down in 2011. And while many of these above-mentioned lawsuits are baseless shakedowns of collection agencies, it’s no secret that collectors have become more industrious with their tactics, including litigation.
John Ulzheimer is the President of Consumer Education at SmartCredit.com, the credit blogger for Mint.com, and a Contributor for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. He is an expert on credit reporting, credit scoring and identity theft. Formerly of FICO, Equifax and Credit.com, John is the only recognized credit expert who actually comes from the credit industry. The opinions expressed in his articles are his and not of Mint.com or Intuit.
Related Videos
Popular Articles


One Comment so far
leave a commentI believe it is so profound that the laws today have not changed to help govern collectors against debtors who are abusive and harrassing. It is always reported what a collecctor has done but not the debtors. Debtors have have made racial slurs, deragatory comments, and harrassing phone calls to collectors over the years and no law protects the collector. There have been undocumented facts that debtor’s will purposely take out debt and not pay the debt back just to wait for that collection call to bait a collector into violation of FDCPA regulations and and then sue the company and the collector to obtain civil funds. It is not made public debtors who abuse the financial system by over extending themselves in credit debt and then claim harrassment when they are contacted to pay the debt’s back. I thought our country was built on responsiblity and accountability. America allows the freedom of debtors to request credit but have no responsibility in paying it back? I do not excuse the fact that their are collectors very few I might add that have crossed the line in collecting debt. Collections companies do not tolerate underminding tactics by collectors and are immediately punished by termination of employment when caught in the act even before and when there is no lawsuit obtained. I also believed when our country said that when you do the crime you do the time, and there have been collector’s and people in general that have committed offenses in their past and have paid their dues. These collector’s that have a criminal past have made changes to their life style and are planting their feet into a new life thru employment instead of crime, paying tax’s instead of filing for disability or welfare. Americans some say they do not want to carrie the load of others who are not working but living on the goverment system but then we punish them by not giving the a right to employment and to become a tax paying citizen by writing articles thru the Star Tribune. If a person was truly given a fare shot at Equel Opportunity of Employment in the United States then you would not have the issue of one hiding their background but openly discussing it and proving their skills and character for who they are today. What if it was you that had a petty offense 10 years ago and have not committed a crime since that time. Do you feel you should have the right to Equel Opportunity of Employment like everyone else or should you be put on watch or banned from making a living because of your past. How come no article is written about the greed of the FDCPA attorneys that look for debtor’s like chasing an ambulance to file suit against companies and then they file astronomicle amount of money in attorney fees. These attorneys will prep these debtors to change the true story of the call they had with a collector so they can place a claime against an agency or law firm that collects debt so they can fill their own pockets. No one has stated why lawsuits against agencies and lawfirms have gone thru the roof in numbers. The economy is down and every one has taken a large hit including collection firms. So you have more debtor’s filing suit and more attorney’s that have left one filed of practice to practice suing debt collection companies now and more money made by these attorney’s in the past 2 years then ever before. Attorney’s are coaching testimonies by debtos and doctoring alleged complaints against collection agencies and firms because the laws have been made specically for the consumer to negate paying their debts instead of paying them and the debtor’s dont pay attorney fees the agencies are having to pay it. Hmmmm Think about it