A Visual Guide to the Financial Crisis:The Bailout

Share This
What do you do if you don’t have the money to pay a debt? If you are like most of us, you borrow. The US Government is no different. In order to pay for the $700 billion bailout, it will have to borrow more money, increasing the national debt. But who will pay for this massive bailout? If you are a US taxpayer, you will.
Here is a visual guide to understanding how the bailout is funded and a couple of financial experts’ take on how it could be funded.
Source:10 Ways to Bail Out Wall Street (and Main Street) Without Soaking Taxpayers in Debt
For more personal finance visualizations see: WallStats.com
Organize your financial life.
Use Mint.com to see where your money goes, get bill reminders and alerts, track your investment performance, and find extra savings. It’s FREE!
Find Out MoreHow Mint Can Help
See Where You Spend
Mint.com auto-categorizes all of your transactions so you’ll always know where your money goes. Find out more »
Popular Articles

149 Comments so far
leave a comment-
David 463 days ago
like
-
jess 463 days ago
like
-
Sleep State 463 days ago
like
-
JB 463 days ago
like
-
Haji 463 days ago
like
-
Derek 463 days ago
like
-
Damian 463 days ago
like
-
Robert 463 days ago
like
-
Javier 463 days ago
like
-
Dan 463 days ago
like
-
Ian Boyd 463 days ago
like
-
Storm9 463 days ago
like
-
Jason 463 days ago
like
-
Thats Just Dumb 463 days ago
like
-
Mclusky 463 days ago
like
-
Mclusky 463 days ago
like
-
Jim 463 days ago
like
-
Bob 463 days ago
like
-
gary 463 days ago
like
-
Josuf 463 days ago
like
-
Tim 463 days ago
like
-
spacejam 463 days ago
like
-
Paul 463 days ago
like
-
Simon 463 days ago
like
-
joe blow 463 days ago
like
-
Jason 463 days ago
like
-
1clearthinker 463 days ago
like
-
Jason Green 463 days ago
like
-
jess 463 days ago
like
-
Marty 463 days ago
like
-
Name 463 days ago
like
-
AJ 463 days ago
like
-
Tróndur 463 days ago
like
-
zero 463 days ago
like
-
MH 463 days ago
like
-
Hoss 463 days ago
like
-
Dovi 463 days ago
like
-
Jana 463 days ago
like
-
Joe 463 days ago
like
-
mike 463 days ago
like
-
wickerdobsen 462 days ago
like
-
DISGORGE THEM NOW 462 days ago
like
-
Craig Matthews 462 days ago
like
-
Trichome 462 days ago
like
-
Jim 462 days ago
like
-
Rizzo 462 days ago
like
-
Another Person 462 days ago
like
-
Dr.Who 462 days ago
like
-
BillyJoe 462 days ago
like
-
Joe 462 days ago
like
1 2 3 Next »Interesting diagram but I am wondering why the last arrow was left off? What arrow, you ask?
The one where large companies and the wealthy people who fund new ones leave the country to go where tax laws are more favorable. We see it already with where a company incorporates – where tax laws favor it or they are given breaks. Even Obama criticized McCain’s health plan, in one debate, because health care companies would just go where they could get the most profits.
I am not sure why people seem to think that a different standard will emerge if we continue to increase taxes on the wealthy.
Where are they going to go? Mexico? Africa? Canada and Europe already have higher taxes than US. If a wealthy person wants to live in the third world to get a tax break than so be it, no doubt their income was already largely sheltered from the government anyways.
And can we do away with this “the wealthy are themost taxed myth”. Just ask Warren Buffet, his tax rate was %17.7 last year. I was taxed at a higher rate working in a sewing machine factory. Most CEO’s are taxed at a lower rate than their secretaries. So if they want to indulge in some capital flight fantasy, then good riddance, it’s not like they are the ones driving innovation anyways.
David,
Interesting comment on the interesting diagram but I am wondering why you left the VERY last arrow off? What arrow, you ask?
The one where the middle class, which is comprised of the majority of consumers and electoral constituents, and from which those large companies and their wealthy stockholders derive profit, suddenly plunges straight down into the toilet, is no longer able to spend the money those companies need (or–yikes–is unable to repay loans that were designed to default in the first place) in order to continue business operations.
Wouldn’t it be great if supply and demand were the very bottom line, and there was no external practical reality that couldn’t be easily reduced to the terms you are using? Wouldn’t it be awesome if by giving more money to wealthy people, it would just make everyone wealthy? Wouldn’t it be great if whatever sounded good on paper in the nineteenth century would always work in real life, forever?
Man, I wish you were right, because if you were, I would be a millionaire CEO with health insurance and an H2 and so would you and everyone else, and money wouldn’t even be scarce anymore!
The problem is that you’re wrong. Your people had a solid eight years of tax cuts for the wealthy and finance deregulation to work their Reagan/Bushonomic hocus pocus, and all it did was turn the largest surplus any nation has ever known into the largest debt any nation has ever known.
This isn’t The Wealth of Nations, nor is it a game of Monopoly. As a matter of fact, what you and many armchair economists like yourself haven’t realized is…
…This is actually HAPPENING in REAL LIFE, RIGHT NOW, to YOU!
Wow, congratulations, you came up with the novel idea of taking money from the “evil” rich people and corporations.
I’m done with you guys.
I love the “it’s not my money so what do I care? they’re rich, they’ll get over it” mentality. pursuit of profit turns the wheels, don’t punish it. 50% emergency tax? really?
My humble opinion:
It’s the fault of fractional-reserve banking. Banks are allowed to create loans against money they take in as deposits. It encourages credit but creates “artificial” money. The real money is in the bank’s vaults but then loans are created for every 9 out of 10 dollars deposited out of thin air. Banks have been given this right and it’s great for furthering economic growth but since it’s a bubble by nature, there exists a risk of collapse.
I think eliminating fractional-reserve banking is the answer. It would make money much more expensive and commerce would grind to a halt. But, the value of our money would be incredibly stable and bubble-bursting proof. Banks would only be loaning money they had from their profits so they are the only ones who could lose. Peoples’ money would be safely in vaults where, even if the bank fails, the money could be retrieved.
One could only wish that the 3rd part of the diagram could become a reality. This country needs a society driven conscience instead of a profit driven one.
Great analysis, but the solution appears flawed. The rich already carry this country with the taxes they pay. How will continuing to screw them help? Soon we will not have any more rich, either because we have taken all their money or because they have left the country. Why would someone stay in American when they can keep, spend and pass on the money they make in other countries?
And with the number of layoffs, buyouts, bankruptcies, and bailouts happening today, do you really think taxing corporations and industries will fix anything? All you are doing is increasing unemployment. Their fare share comes from employing people who pay income tax.
They wouldn’t leave you ass hat, and if they did, good for them, make sure they couldn’t do business in the states without financial consequences.
Exactly, David.
One of the many ironies this diagram displays is the elimination of overseas tax havens…
…yeahhh.
Needs references.
That is the worst plan ever. You can take your socialist policies and shove it up your ass.
Sheer Lunacy
That kids is what we call socialism. Lets take money from people who work hard to get a good education and make a lot of money and give it to those who sit on their @$$es all day. The whole recession is being blamed on corporations, and yes they do deserve some blame, but the housing meltdown is due to Americans who aren’t fiscally responsible an took out mortgages they cant pay back. One of the biggest sources of revenue on here is to tax corporations more: What happens when you tax a company more? I can tell you one thing for sure, they aren’t going to just eat the cost, they will pass it on to the consumer and the people you thought you were helping will end up paying for it in the end. America was founded and became great on the idea that if you work hard you can make a lot of money and prosper. We hit a rough patch and now everyone wants to take the money from the rich and give it to the poor. Where is the incentive to work hard?????
If you tax the rich they will just up and leave, they have the money to go were they want. Even a modest 3% would make a sizable number move out.
If you tax the rich they will just up and leave, they have the money to go were they want. Even a modest 3% tax on wealth would make a sizable number move out, and then your back to square one.
I like the first two diagrams – they summarize nicely how bad these government bailouts are. The third one is just bizarre. How does a financial management website advocate taxing wealth? I counted four times where the plan outlined in the third diagram raised taxes not on income or consumption but on saved money.
The “Main Street Bailout” doesn’t go to Main Street – at all. The renewable fuels funding is nothing more than a subsidy for energy companies. The 50B mortgage rescue package will likely be administered by some government entity (and I didn’t see a plan for making those mortages affordable in the first place). And the 20B in state funding won’t go any farther than state capitals.
All this plan does is fund government programs that exist for the sole purpose of giving someone a clear conscience without helping anyone in the process.
Hey David. I say good riddance. Those greedy bastards are the reason we are where we are. There is a difference between “free market” and “greed rules”. If you can’t tell the difference, study recent headlines for awhile.
How about people and/or business do for themselves, fail or succeed on their merits. This is called individual freedom.
Cut all Federal Government 85% and then have Government return to promoting the common welfare instead of providing for the common welfare.
Decisions:
To be wealthy and live in the USA.
To be excessively wealthy and live in a tax sheltered country.
…hmmm
Why should someone be penalized to a greater degee just because they make more money? It could have been a product of luck, it could have been a product of hard work or better education…who knows…but why can’t people be happy for others success (financially speaking). I mean David is right…the purpose of a free market is to spawn the best and the brightest to work hard for their fortunes so the cream rises to the top and we as a country move forward with innovations and leadership. Penalizing the Have’s would simply be the equivalent of brain drain…forcing the best to leave seeking shelter from an overly taxed system. Where would that leave an already struggling economy? It’s up to everyone…rich..poor…worthy and unworthy to do their part.
Flow chart looks great….
David…the argument that wealthy will move to other countries is bogus. They like living here, their families are here, their friends are here, their homes and their long term interests are here……they aren’t going to pack up and go and live along amongst people they have no relation to just because they got taxed a little.
the real problem is education. and the microwave.
@David: I agree with your point to a degree, but the USA provides a secure and stable place for these corporations to do business – not to mention a ready market of willing consumers to sell to. They aren’t just going to leave and go somewhere better, because there isn’t anywhere better…
Certainly, it seems fair that *everyone* should pay something towards any bailout, not just lump the entire burden on the tax paying middle classes – or more accurately, their children and grandchildren.
WOW, you have this all figured out! You are the smartest person in the world. It’s amazing that non of our politicians can figure this out, it’s so simple.
So tell me again why you’re not in public office?
Oh that’s right, it’s because the only people who know how to solve the countries problems are stuck cutting hair, sweeping floors, and writing blogs.
Show me your research and marketing analysis behind your ‘numbers’.
That’s what I thought. You know nothing of money, economy and politics. Stick to your lousy blog. Spewing your opinion to .000001% of the internet population makes you feel empowered.
I agree David. People assume the wealthy will just grin and bear their punishment for the nation’s ridiculous governmental policies and economic illusions. Supporters of all these new taxes should be careful of driving away the source of all this revenue, or those that pay 50% of the country’s taxes will up and leave the party. It throws a wrench in the incentive to earn more.
I have one particular grievance with the “elimination of tax preference for capital gains”. This is described as “taxing wealth and work at the same rate”. Do you understand where people who invest their money get the overwhelming majority of that money? THEY WORK FOR IT!! That’s essentially double taxation on their income already.
First of all we shouldn’t be bailing anyone out. That aside, you mention the playing field… those receiving this bailout money are the ones getting an uneven playing field than the rest of us.
I’m blown away by the line about “A modest 3% [Wealth] surcharge would level the playing field.” You have got to be French. This country is about encouraging those who aren’t wealthy to become wealthy, not punishing the wealthy in order to bail out failures. I’m not wealthy, but I’m trying to be some day. Stop making it harder.
You’re basing this off of the supposition that the bailout *had* to happen. That just isn’t the case. End the bailouts!!! Socializing the losses of large companies is not the way to “fix” the economy. Stealing from the rich to pay for a series of bad decisions by powerful people isn’t much better than stealing from everyone.
@joe blow
The solutions provided come from Chuck Collins, a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC.
What’s your day job?
Interesting comments here. The chart above is more or less a spoof, or humorous peice, and I see people in here getting angry about it.
I really believe bailouts are a cop-out and a pure example of the greed and corruption of Washington. If I start a business, and run it into the ground, why is it that I don’t get a bailout? Oh wait, because I’m not a multi-billion dollar CEO, that’s why. Only the richest people in america “deserve” the bailouts right? It’s all a huge joke!
@spacejam: It’s not bogus. Look at Jim Rogers. He says publicly that he sees prosperity elsewhere, and he wants his daughters to speak chinese.
…Or, we could just refuse any sort of bail-out. Why should a company or individual that didn’t manage their finances well get a hand-out? They should have to suffer the consequences. Stealing from those that are financially conservative is not a good policy, and it certainly isn’t the American way.
I’m proud that many people here recognize this for what it is: socialism.
David… let them
– ps. stop being so afraid of socialism, and on a site note it is not = to communism.
I think most of the people here are missing something in the discussion of Rich People moving to other countries. Just moving to another country with lower taxes does not mean you no longer have to pay United States Income Taxes. The only way that you can avoid paying those would be to give your US Citizenship. How many of these Rich People would be willing to do that?
Shorter David: “I’m sick, but I can’t take too much medicine, or the bacteria might go infect someone else!”
Why is that last section all about taxing MORE? Maybe we should cut some government spending and find $900B that way.
Sure a few of those loopholes need to be closed but lets get a Lean government first.
@Thats Just Dumb
Wow man, where to start? I wouldn’t call it Socialism to have the wealthy and corporations pay the proper taxes due. It would be socialism if the government out right took them over, or froze all their funds for their personal use…..
Those fiscally irresponsible Americans? Well, when the only loan you can get to purchase that house is a balloon because an artificial and inaccurate system was put in place to rate your credit and limit your options, what choice do you have? I don’t blame the Americans, they chose from among the options they were given by banks out to make a buck. The question you should ask is why they even had that option to pick from to begin with.
I do agree though that the corporations will attempt to pass the buck on to the consumers, but I actually wish that would happen. People might actually buck up and find out they really didn’t need that can of Red Bull, the extra large fries, the GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip, and then free market would take over and prices would eventually reach equilibrium.
I honestly don’t have a clue where the author thinks the money companies will use to pay increased taxes is going to come from. If you accept reduced profits, then the result is a worsening stock price for large companies, which in turn affects the rest of the market. Instead, companies simply trim jobs and cut benefits to employees, as far as that is possible; at that point, they can then take their lumps in the market.
It would be lovely if we could just tax ourselves to prosperity, but it is as simplistic an idea as tax cuts as the only avenue for economic recovery.
But that’s fine, I’m sure you feel better after sticking it to the rich people!
Some interesting points for sure. But a question: wasn’t higher taxes (top rate went to 79%) one of the things that drove the US into the great depression?
I’m certainly no apologist for the wealthy, but why does your plan single out the wealthy and large earners as those who should shoulder the lions share of the burden? 80% of wealthy Americans are single generation, self made….do we really want to stifle that sort of capitalist drive?
I agree with you on the corporate tax points however. Obscene that corporations don’t pay their share.
BTW, Derek you have a great point. But rather than doing away with fractional reserve entirely, what about lowering the leverage (e.g., 4 to 1)?
I agree 100% with david. This is quite possibly the worst/retarded suggestion ever on what the government should do. The rich already pay a ridiculous percentage ( alomost 40 in income taxes alone) of their income in taxes and now you want them to pay a 50% emergency tax??? Idiotic……
Lets see how the filthy rich are made to cough up money which they have inherited over the years, and left the entire state in a mess. In any case middle class has gone broke and does not fit into this revival package!
“joe blow”, “Thats Just Dumb”, “Storm9″, “David”, “Mclusky” and “Robert”,
hummm… from what I’ve seen recently, it’s the RICH who are begging for our tax dollars.
The head of Fannie Mae, Daniel Mudd, reaped a 7 percent rise in pay last year (2007), to $13.4 million, while the company lost money and the country suffered its worst housing crisis in decades. THESE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT NEED TO BE DISGORGED OF THE MONEY THEY STOLE!!!!!!! These CEO’s like Countrywide’s Mozillo are NOT representative of the free hand of capitalism that America is based on. They want the government off their backs when they’re making money, and when they are collapsing, here they come begging. LET THEM FAIL NOW.
What our government is doing right now is CORPORATE SOCIALISM and it is plain for all to see. You idiots criticizing the “theoretical” diagram above, why don’t you speak out against the REAL raping of the american worker and the wealthy americans who earn their money legitimately? Speak out against CORPORATE THIEFS NOW.
Hello? Anyone there?? I didn’t think so…
“That’s Just Dumb” said:
‘The whole recession is being blamed on corporations, and yes they do deserve some blame, but the housing meltdown is due to Americans who aren’t fiscally responsible an took out mortgages they cant pay back.’
I took out a mortgage well within my means, fully capable of affording it, with money to spare.
Then a bunch of rich banks loaned money to people who couldn’t afford the loans, then all the CEOs went to poker games and threw all of those mortgages (the bad ones and the good ones, like mine) into the pot.
Now I have to worry if I’m going to have a job tomorrow because of the recession.
Who’s looking out for those of us who got perfectly reasonable, affordable loans that we were able to pay off just fine until the banks started playing poker games with our houses and the houses of people they shouldn’t have loaned money to?
The error in accepting this as a better source for the bailout is that, in order to that, you must first accept that there needs to be a bailout.
I’m with AJ – refuse the bailout, or more correctly termed, nationalization of private industry.
Stop being afraid of socialism? ha! Well you are right, you should not FEAR anything, including socialism. However, that doesn’t meant you shouldn’t understand it and be able to squash it. Socialism is the death knell of liberty and sovereignty, and by destroying those you also destroy standards of living, entire economies, and even classes of society.
We are certainly on our way! It’s too bad that so many people have to wait until it knocks on their front door before they’ll acknowledge it’s really happening.
Anyone who thinks the rich are taxed at 40% does know anyone who is actually rich. The reality is they barely pay anything in taxes once the accountants are through. That’s how the rich stay rich. While this chart is flawed it does have some strong points. Fairly taxing the wealthy (and I am not talking about some guy making 120K as a low level exec, I am talking about households that bring in over 1 Million a year) is an important step. If they are taxed even near the same rate as the working class, say in the range of 30-40%, then it would just be a level playing field. Consider this: I make 50,000 dollars for my household annually and have to give 20,000 of that to the tax man
My brother makes 1 Million per year and has to give $200,000 then who is hurting more at the end of the day. You all whine about the rich leaving! That is the truly ridiculous thought. They made their wealth here. Do you think they are all just gonna pick up and set up shop somewhere else? Where is this financial Xanadu. Is there a special handshake to get in? No other country in the world, save Luxembourg maybe, provides such reckless tax shelters, and tax cuts the way the US does. Perhaps if you thought outside of your pathetic narrow minded view of the world you would see that the US is on its ass because of the greedy cash grabbing practices of the wealthy few, and they are the only people not actually suffering from the outcome.
Yeah ummm, socialism is the right way to go…. errrr ummm WTF!!! Its only a matter of time before Obama and his slew of criminals ruin our great country… As far as the big 3 bailout… We dont want the cars they make so why are they making us pay for them…. The people have spoken we dont want to bail out!!!
PS. The true bail out plan
BAILOUT –> DOES NOT HAPPEN
I like how all the people are arguing for “free market” and liberty and such. Free market does not equal liberty, at all, even in a basic sense. Remember slavery? no? That was free market, it took government intervention to stop that, limiting the plantations which took the same exact (yes exact) stand on limiting free market if you stopped it.
As far as the extra taxes, it would look like *gasp* Reagan (your god for some odd reason) taxes. Bush has destroyed the tax system so the very rich pay almost nothing. For more information on this, check out tax rates for capital gains, or in other words, money you make by just having money, not hard real work.
The rich will not leave the country to some “tax haven”. Even after 3% loss of money, they still have more than they can spend, ever. If they went to these tax haven countries, they would be paying the same amount in the small militias they would have to hire to protect them, as well as being pretty much exiled from the USA.
Almost all of you conservative criers have no civic/economic/governmental knowledge, you have taken basic high school classes and think you know your way around the world but it is like reading the ideas of a 2 year old.
Please look up the definitions of Socialism, Capitalism, Liberty, Free Market before posting again.
I am investing in ” Payless”
@Author of that terrible flow chart: That is one huge chip on your shoulder.
Actually, all the money being paid in the bailout is pointless. Americans are defaulting yes, some of those are going to happen anyway. Some are loosing their jobs and a good mortgage is going to lead to foreclosure just as fast as a bad one. Everywhere I look, I see this company closing this factory and moving it somewhere else – Mexico, China, etc. As long as this continues, we are going to keep falling. The NAFTA style agreements are doing this. In my area, there are 2,000 people at the unemployment office trying to get the 46 jobs available. What are those, SERVICE jobs, you can’t move them to another country. The only way to turn this around, is to stop the bleeding of jobs out of the US. How? The NAFTA style agreements are binding, they can’t be easily undid. We do what they don’t address. WE TAX MONEY LEAVING THIS COUNTRY. 50-90 cents of every dollar will fix most of it, A company wants to hide off-shore, no problem, they will not be making a good profit until they move BACK into the US along with the jobs they moved out. The US Dollar would start increase in value as less of them would make out of this country. CEO xyz wants to hide his income, where, not outside the US.
This will never happen, we have the best government that can be bought. The ones buying the government are the same ones that would lose most by a scheme like this. Get ready for the worst depression there will be. Remember, when the banks can’t take away you property, the government will for unpaid back taxes, that happened in the 30’s the few that remember that time will know what I’m talking about; the rest of us forgot that part of history, and we are about to live it again! Good Luck!