Golden Parachutes: How the Bankers Went Down

Share This
When high-ranking executives are fired from a company, for whatever reason, they don’t go to the back of the unemployment line. Instead, they typically receive compensation in the form of the “golden parachute.” Golden parachutes can include severance pay, cash bonuses, stock options or other benefits. In the case of the financial crisis and the ensuing bank failures, if it seems like these executives are being rewarded for poor performance, you may be right. Here’s a look at what some bankers made on their way down.
For more personal finance visualizations see: WallStats.com
Organize your financial life.
Use Mint.com to see where your money goes, get bill reminders and alerts, track your investment performance, and find extra savings. It’s FREE!
Find Out MoreHow Mint Can Help
See Where You Spend
Mint.com auto-categorizes all of your transactions so you’ll always know where your money goes. Find out more »
Popular Articles

57 Comments so far
leave a comment-
Sibren 270 days ago
like
-
matt snider 270 days ago
like
-
S.Smith 269 days ago
like
-
Dealin Doug 269 days ago
like
-
valencio 269 days ago
like
-
John - Global Investment Watch 269 days ago
like
-
Edward Chinn 269 days ago
like
-
tommess 269 days ago
like
-
Richard 269 days ago
like
-
Woofer 269 days ago
like
-
Michael 269 days ago
like
-
H P 269 days ago
like
-
Mike B 269 days ago
like
-
w00t! 269 days ago
like
-
Nichelle 269 days ago
like
-
Jin 269 days ago
like
-
Benn Frank Lynn 269 days ago
like
-
oldnetgenius 269 days ago
like
-
Sam Sweiti 269 days ago
like
-
DCD 269 days ago
like
-
the_pistol 269 days ago
like
-
Don 269 days ago
like
-
Ancient One 269 days ago
like
-
John Robert 269 days ago
like
-
Michael Swart 269 days ago
like
-
Jason 269 days ago
like
-
David 269 days ago
like
-
al 269 days ago
like
-
Not suggesting anything 269 days ago
like
-
pauly 269 days ago
like
-
Fred Schmit 269 days ago
like
-
Uncle B 269 days ago
like
-
Recession Survivor 269 days ago
like
-
Chris 269 days ago
like
-
Wjacobs 269 days ago
like
-
stu 269 days ago
like
-
Cataplt 269 days ago
like
-
Brian 269 days ago
like
-
Ratepayer 268 days ago
like
-
Ades 267 days ago
like
-
Bryan 266 days ago
like
-
Andy 266 days ago
like
-
Thomas 264 days ago
like
-
AJ 264 days ago
like
-
Jean-Victor Côté 264 days ago
like
-
J. Stevens 263 days ago
like
-
Jeff Hech 262 days ago
like
-
Andy 259 days ago
like
-
Pam 259 days ago
like
-
stu 258 days ago
like
1 2 Next »Nice…
And that’s what costing us (all around the globe) a lot of bucks…
We could have balanced the California budget with these payout packages… I don’t understand how the banking industry and the crooks at the heads of these companies can get away with this.
This is astonishing news.
Anybody got a sniper rifle? I’d like some of my taxes back from these idiots
All this money should be recovered by the government. Its shameful that these fools spend money to renovate their offices while the world is burning around them.. I’d call them modern day Neros’
Valencio
DesktopBudget.com
Nice visual. The tragedy is that practically every public company in America has some sort of golden parachute for their executives. What is needed are “Tin Parachutes,” compensation for laid off workers at these companies.
If you are a shareholder, there are steps you can take. Read http://globalinvestmentwatch.com/2008/12/28/vote-no-and-vote-often/ for some ideas in this vein.
There are some indicators that this might change. President Obama spoke directly to the issue of executive greed in his address last night. Stay tuned…
If a hungry man steals a loaf of bread he gets up to seven years in prison but the man who steals millions is decorated with medals. It is full time to hold these culprits accountable, seize their asset and put them in a place where John Public can stay outside and look at them. They have no conscience.
this is white collor crime in your face the courts are even set up to accommodate these guys buy putting them up in prison where you can pay to have food brought in linens and so on.they say if you steel more than $50,000,000.00 you go to these nonviolent prisons.but i guess if you steel even more like ma doff you get to stay in your on place.steel a 6 pack go to jail steal million and wipe people out get a slap,behind closed doors.
The thing about these packages is that almost every CEO has one. Most wont take the job with out one.
This is SOP in several industries, and should stop. Chances of that happening, depends if we really want the government interfering more with what is supposed to be a free economy. Frankly, the feds should have never stepped in to begin with even with a higher possibility of collapse. It would be better to get it done and over with than to drag it out like now.
I’m speechless…
it’s just stunning to me that people can get so much money beyond even their huge paycheck.
crazy…
I am a little disturbed by the equivocating of CEOs that has been there for multiple decades through good and bad and those who have only been for a short time. Still $188 million is a hell of a lot of money even at 39 years.
Well nice to know someone is doing alright out of the recession. Maybe if the Bush administration had proposed a bailout with proper strings attached or if Congress had acted on behalf of the public this wouldn’t have happened.
I think the bankers concerned and all law makers in charge (Past and present) should be indicted for defrauding the public of billions – like about $1.5 Trillion in the two bailouts.
Are these payout packages only or are they the result of options, etc.. as well that were given to them over the years they worked there?
IMHO they should be allowed to keep otions but get Zippo for a payout package. Shame on Boards for signing these bad deals in the first place.
Alan Fishman wins! Headed WaMu for 17 days and took away $19 million!
Even I would be willing to head WaMu/Chase for a few days at the $1.12 million per day rate. But, my PA would have to be HOT, or its no deal!
Great post. I only wish we had these guys’ addresses, so laid off employees could move in with them if they lose their homes.
MJ was paid $30 M a year back in the mid-90’s. Other athletes make more than most of those “golden parachutes” yearly. Let’s cut the populist hate and realize these guys are getting paid fair market rates.
Since O’Neal is (accurately) ebony-toned here, shouldn’t Mozilo be orange?
The board of directors and ultimately the voting share holders had to have approved all these golden parachutes in the first place. Apparently, they saw fit to not bother to tie these generous severance packages to performance and tenure. Very expensive way to learn a lesson.
BTW that tax bracket is about 50%. So, Angelo Mozilo’s $188 million was whittled down to about $94. Of course, there are all kinds of tax loopholes that could have beenused to increase the bottom line.
The entire system is flawed. Capitalism allows people to be overly rich often on the account of others and this, is a very good example. What makes it even more tragic is that there are more people today suffering from the bad economy (caused by CEOs & Government bad decisions) that these astronomical figures given away as package deals to CEOs sound more like ‘legal’ embezzlement.
I gave this a lot of thought before I realized Wall St. behavior is no different than my high school job at the Ice Cream shop. Every day, my family would expect me to bring home free Ice Cream, just because I worked there. “After all, there’s thousands of gallons of the stuff. Why would they miss two quarts?”
No one gave a thought to the losses of the owner, it just seemed “right” to everyone that I should do this. Ask yourselves if you ever had this feeling too. I would argue it’s almost natural (though of course I am not justifying it).
Unfortunately, these people deal with Money all day, and it simply doesn’t have the value to them that it does to you and me. The losses they are causing fall in that same unreal blind spot. Just like the Ice Cream, they don’t feel cares or will notice a few million missing from the Trillions they handle all day.
It’s like working in an M&M factory and sticking your hand in the stream for a few nibbles. “Who could possibly notice or care because there is so much?”
Just sayin’.
Don’t forget this: the boards of directors of these companies approved the compensation packages for these executives. These CEO’s were probably just getting what was in their contracts.
That said, it’s a system of greedy frat buddies, rewarding each other at our expense. Capitalize the profits, socialize the losses!
The next generation of executives will be paid and bonused based solely on the performance of the company, as it should be.
kudos to Leo Abess and Robert Willumstad for not succumbing to avarice. It is an ugly thing in America that any person can arrive at the point where only 100 times what is needed to survive is enough. Bring back government bank regulations.
The fundamental theory on managers and executive drawing more compensation based on a concept that they held more responsibility.
The corporate veil and golden parachutes have successfully managed most risk from that responsibility to nil. Bonus packages have aggravated the problem by increasing an interest in short-term exploitations at the expense of long-term viability. Management fads like outsourcing/offshoring, managing by contract, revolving-door HR, and redefining operations processes as sequences of job-work further insulate managers in the near-term from leadership and responsibility.
The problem of having executive accept real responsibilties for their positions and compensation has been reinforced by flawed logic about “attracting the best talent” with measurements of management and leadership quality that have often been irrelevant or incorrect, like the obviously misdiagnosed “health of the company” myth. The difficulty of identifying, attracting, and maintaining suitable executive management or leadership is exacerbated by tolerance for mental health problems like narcissistic personality disorder, psychopathic personality disorder, etc.
Marx and Engles expounded an inherently flawed concept for developing management and leadership responsibility, but some of that concept has been adopted by executives. While Employee Stock Ownership Plans would logically form the basis for corporate responsibility through a democracy of the proletariat with interests in the career-length viability of an organization, the effectiveness of that governance has been limited by incestuous relationships between executives and boards of directors that has become institutionalized and now effectively forms a union of professional executives and directors.
Resolving these problems sufficiently to enforce any reasonable executive responsibility level will not occur without developing real accountability within the corporate veil, and reducing the union-type practices of executives and directors networking to keep themselves in ovecompensated positions of irresponsibility. Attempts are sometimes made to measure the success of marketing in creating customer loyalty, which is really more a result of product or service quality and value; a similar measurement of staff loyalty to management could form an interesting basis in compensating executives and directors for their leadership relative to the intra-team loyalty of staff that may render the existing “leadership team” irrelevant.
“I don’t understand how the banking industry and the crooks at the heads of these companies can get away with this.”
It’s called the Federal Reserve. It is neither Federal nor a Reserve.
I know his parachute is grey, but should R. Willumstad be on this list at all? seeing how he really didn’t accept any severance pay?
The numbers that these people took home are staggering. In no other industry would they be able to take that much home with them while the company fails. The worst part is many of these people took are tax money.
Because we let them!
Remember that on the web we read from top to bottom. The graphic seemed like it was meant to be read from the bottom up.
You know, if these people were to die suddenly (and their spouses) we would get most of this money back into the government through estate taxes.
I’m not suggesting anything. Just saying.
Did anyone not notice that Richard Fuld’s parachute was in september 2007?
gawd I love being a banker.
Sadly, Capitalism, the cancer of democracy, breeds and exhaults a certain type of anti- social psychosis. We tend to follow, without question, the ruthless sociopath and denigrate the reasonable, practical compassionate human. The American Dictionary must more truthfully redefine the Corporation as a ” pile of money with a sociopath at the top”. The problem lies in the scewed legal rights given a corporation, witch encourage a very dangerous side of the human personality to be favored, and nurtured by high material reward for destructive behavior. Unfortunately, these corrupt monsters took over banking in the U.S.A. and were influential enough to enroll the simpleminded George Bush. The Banksters and their corporate wanabes raped the American people and their country as no other group before, save their oil industry equivalents, the Oil barons, and have left for warmer climates and lives of extreme luxury with bags of the peoples’ money in tow. Unfortunately they did this at a time when the average American lacks even high school education, and most labor jobs, outside the service industry have gone off-shore. This makes any recovery extremely difficult. The Chinese, on the other hand are well equipped to provide everything the white collar classes in America want or need, and at better than half the cost of any domestic efforts. For example: GM struggles with the electric car the ”Volt” and so far, it is really only “Vaporware” while China, using American white collar investors money, have produced a working “Volt” replica and have orders for it from, of all people, Israel! a U.S. “protectorate” SEE: http://www.cleantech.com/news/3983/chinas-byd-sells-first-mass-produced-plug-cars
Any myths about the U.S.A. returning to its former power, are just that, myths. The U.S. will rapidly deteriorate into a third world place of sexual depravity, drunkenness, drug addiction, Elvis worshipers, V-8 engines, crooked OPEC deals (complete with kickbacks to the right folks), memories of “The way we were”, cowboy legends revisited ad nausium, and loud cheap bar music, as the futility in struggling against the monumental Asian population grows. All countries who suffer from the downfall of America will only recover when they re-align themselves with the new Asian reality in the world. Fact: China has more post grad students with IQ’s of 130+ today than the U.S. has high school students, and India is running second to them. Catch this up Yankee Doodle!
Take back the money, end of problem. I’m with “not suggesting anything”
C’Mon now people, this is business. It’s 100% ok that these CEO’s get what they get. If any company wants to pay a guy that much to leave, it’s ok with me. Here’s where you should all have a problem: Allowing those companies to survive. they should all go bankrupt if they are insolvent. And yes that means many innocent people will suffer. But isn’t that what’s really required for change? Things only change when it becomes too much. This would be it. Instead WE will save them from themselves. That is the issue here. Maybe some new banks should be created with people in mind instead of selling money at outragous prices (read: high interest). If I started a bank it would be for people with razor thin interest rates. But how do you start a bank?
“The love of money is the root of all evil”, no statement has ever been so true as it is now.” The borrower is servant to the lender.” These two statements are straight out of the bible that so many are trying to abolish today, a little at a time. Another name for the love of money is plain old fashion greed. Companies are saying they can’t get good talent if they don’y pay these astronomical wages, well excuse me but this good talent just put your company in the toilet financially. Where I come from, they fire you for poor performance and escort you on the way out and they certainly don’t pay you. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the reason these companies are now insolvent is because the head honchos spent every dollar they could get their hands on for frivolous crap. Jets are not necessary to run a struggling business,corporate retreats in expensive hotels, sponsorship for golf tournaments, the list is endless and now we as taxpayers who watch our dollars so that we can live within our means are bailing out these mindless windbags. If our politicians don’t pass a law against these golden parachutes, I’m going to believe that their pockets are being lined also and maybe they don’t receive enough of a kickback from lobbyists. From what I observe, you have got to be crooked to be in politics today. The few who have been exposed for tax evasion is probably only a drop in the bucket to the number who are guilty of it. At last we may never know.
One thing people seem to forget is that the ceo’s don’t award themselves their parachutes, the board of the company does. Maybe they haggle when taking on the job for a good deal, but who doesn’t.
Have you ever gone on an interview for a career type job and not haggled for some extra vacation or a little more money? It’s the same exact thing, but the numbers are bigger.
If the company makes a deal with an employee for compensation, health benefits, or other perks, I see no reason why they should be able to wiggle out of it just because the company is doing badly, as is the market and lots of other companies.
The real problem is that they manage to negotiate these deals in the first place.
The board can save the company a lot of money by not falling prey to “we want jack welch and we’ll pay anything.” There are plenty of competent people who will do the job for less. And that would be good business anyway.
But I’m not an executive, I’ll never know what really goes on in the boardroom, but I’m sure it has a lot to do with mutual back scratching.
Read Atlas Shrugged you nincompoops. If you want to live in a free and capitalist society, the following rules will always apply:
- Some will rise to greatness from modest beginnings
- Some will rise from the ashes to greatness
- Some will fall to ashes, though modest
- Some will rise to their level of incompetency
- A “reset” button will be hit, and it will all begin again
What do you want, a glass ceiling on capitalism!?!
And to Uncle B, you are the reason I get up and go to work every day. Some day I will own you.
Claw Back, do your research,and never invest in a company if these guys have anything to do with it. They should be ban from
any public traded company.
Bailout money should ONLY come from these banker golden parachutes. All other tax payers should be spared.
Isn’t it “golden handshake” rather than “golden parachute”? Golden parachute is used in the case of job loss through takeovers/acquisitions.
While it’s easy to make these guys our scapegoats, I think fixating our frustrations on this small group will do us no good. They were merely acting on precedent. The signs of the upcoming financial collapse were there but the companies were still making money.
Everyone is upset and many innocents will be hurt in the falling out of this entire situation but we must rationally analyze the situation, understand where the failure occurred and put steps in place to prevent it from happening again. Being angry at cooperate greed doesn’t making pork barrel politics any less of a sin. Excess, mis-management and greed exist everywhere and these are our enemies, not the men with faces and fat paychecks.
A company performance can be 90% credited to CEO who enjoy authority to direct policies. Consider a scenario, A becomes CEO of X bank in 2001 to earn good bonuses, he need to show good profit. He fires thousands of Americans to offshore work and invests in riskier assets (good loans are assets while bad loans are liabilities) and book profit (assuming not cooking in between which is criminal offence). He basks in glory amongs investers while cursed by laidoff employees. In 2007 he reached a point where he cannot layoff more, so no scope of cost cutting (hopefully he’ll not undercut his salary) and he quits smiling with exit bonus and pensions. His successor comes in 2008, sees with horror that most are bad assets while he can’t do much on cost cutting. Who will you blame A or B?
THINK! Shareholders cannot complain since they were accomplice. Shareholders are tax payers too!
And I am Indian with background in outsourcing factory and feel morally obliged to speak truth.
Who writes those contracts that give millions to people who failed their constituents and the people they managed? So called “golden parachute” contracts should always be tied to the performance of the person getting the contract. If the executive takes the company down they should be made to forgo any bonuses and other compensation because of their poor performance. Their fate should be tied to the fate of the companies that they manage. These types of scandals give a bad name to capitalism when it is capitalism that provides the real “stimulus” for widespread prosperity.
I love the uproar over this. Manny just signed a 2 year 45MM contract and no body thinks the Dodgers have lost their mind. 23 year old Lebron James, whose not even college educated is set to make 100 million. David Beckham 245 million? 100mm to a pitcher to pitch every 4th game? If Manny spends next year hurt, or another athlete stops taking performance enhancing drugs and falls flat, no one calls the player a thief.
These guys are chased and acquired just like free agents in sports. There highly educated and control thousands of lives. When they do great things thousands benefit and when the dont pan out, theyre fired. Theyre savvy businessmen, and they understand market conditions are much larger than them self in some circumstances. They are protected accordingly through signing bonus and guaranteed salaries and thus compensated for the skills they provide. JUST LIKE AN ATHLETE.
Lastly, the guy who founded countrywide deserves every bit of his 100mm. He build one of the largest mortgage companies in the world.
No doubt, they are headed for a soft landing, whereas the economy is headed for the doldrums.
If you look back years ago and ask what would happen to a CEO who did this (corporation accountable to the workers and community), you would be told they go to jail. Fraud is fraud. These CEOs were all picked by a few “Bush gang” recruiters. They were there to steal and destroy. The Justice Department and Presidents look the other way.
Maybe in time the people will rise up against these shenanigans.
I like AJ’s musings only to the extent that carrot and stick policy may not work always. A CEO can tweak with this policy by doing short term good for his company while jeopardising long term prospects. Look at my earlier scenario how CEO A tweaks the system and no body can catch A. This framework of carrot and stick needs to be reworked. And for all those complaining voices,greed created this problem, the same greed will take care to get back things back on track.
Equality dictates that all persons make a fair income commiserate with their education, level of experience, etc. To achieve this in the United States we must first address CEO pay. Their pay is ridiculously high, but they are few in number, so once their pay is redistributed it will only add a few dollars each year to the rest of our incomes. Next we must address the income of federal and state employees. Those of us in the private sector receive Medicare at age 65 and full social security retirement at age 67. The typical government employee receives both their retirement medical benefit and pension at age 52 (15 years earlier than the rest of us). If we increase all government employee retirement dates to age 63 then we could use the savings to reduce the full retirement age of the private sector to age 63. A early and more equal retirement date for all would make for a fairer society.
>Equality dictates that all persons make a fair income
>commiserate with their education, level of experience, etc.
What a completely arbitrary basis to start an argument from.
Where is it written that the above is what equality dictates?