is the best way to manage your money. Go there now »

Sign up or log in to mint.com

Pitched These Investment Products? Just Say No.

Share This

Anyone can tell you what to invest in—and everyone will. Most of them are wrong. Here are five investments you should never waste your time on. Bull market, bear market, and anything in between, these are reliably bad ideas that will lose you money.

1. Individual stocks.

Everybody loves that web site showing how much you’d be worth today if you’d bought Apple stock instead of that iPod. That could have been me, with $6000 in my pocket instead of an iPod mini with a dead battery.

What you want to do is find today’s Apple, the company that’s down in the dumps or little-known, and buy in before they release their iPhone. Don’t worry, plenty of commentators will alert you to such opportunities. Motley Fool, for example:

The Best Value Stocks (June 3, 2008)

I went to Google Finance and punched in their first pick, Asta Funding (ASFI), and found that from the day the article was published until the day I’m writing, two years later (at market close on June 21, 2010), it’s up 19.94%! Maybe these guys are smarter than I thought. So I pulled up the other three picks:

Celgene (CELG). Down 6.75%
Research in Motion (RIMM). Down 55.29%
BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BMRN). Down 46.89%

Ouch.

For comparison, the S&P 500 was down 20.51% during the same period, so Celgene actually beat the market. But I’m pretty sure the article wasn’t about how to lose slightly less money than everybody else—and if you bought all four picks, you trailed the S&P.

Not to pick on Motley Fool in particular. Flip open an old issue of Fortune or SmartMoney or Kiplinger’s, and you’ll find the same thing over and over: not only do the hand-picked portfolios almost never outperform the market, but you’ll frequently punch in a ticker symbol and find that the stock has been delisted. The company went out of business, and the stock went to zero.

“Wall Street needs you to believe that picking stocks and timing the market is the winner’s game, because it’s the winner’s game for them,” says Larry Swedroe, director of research for BAM Advisor Services and author of many books on investing. “They make money every time you trade.”

The annoying people who always drop the phrase “low-cost index fund” are right. Index funds are boring. But they work: they beat funds managed by professional money managers nearly all the time. Are you better at picking stocks than a professional fund manager? Me neither. If you like picking stocks, play a fantasy game and put your actual money in index funds.

2. Variable annuities

What do you call an investment that combines life insurance, mutual funds, low returns, high fees, and substantial penalties for early withdrawal? Frankenstein—or a variable annuity.

“The insurance company is only giving guarantees that they expect they’ll never have to pay up on. Because if they did, they’d go under,” says Tim Maurer, a certified financial planner and author of The Financial Crossroads. “Therefore, the protections that they’re offering most people are things that the actuaries at the insurance company, the smartest numbers people in the world, determined that you don’t actually need.”

Not all annuities are bad: the immediate fixed annuity, which converts a lump sum into a guaranteed fixed payment until you die, is a simple and underused tool.

Variable annuities are anything but simple. They’re loaded with hidden fees and expensive add-ons and accessories, and they’re unfavorably taxed. Never invest in something you don’t understand—and if you understand variable annuities, you’ve probably won a Nobel Prize. Put your prize money in an index fund.

3. Gold coins and other collectibles

“Collect for your love of the collectible…not because you expect high investment returns, because you probably won’t get them,” writes Eric Tyson in Investing for Dummies.

Sure, that goes for figurines and plates and your cousin’s nonrepresentational sponge paintings. But what about the darling investment of the moment, gold?

Even if you think the price of gold will continue to rise, gold coins—even circulating ones that trade at the spot price of gold—are the very definition of risky. You have to buy from a dealer and pay a markup. Then you have to figure out where to store it—in a safe deposit box? At your house, in a safe? Are you going to insure it? I want to listen in on this conversation with your insurance company.

In short, the transaction costs of dealing in physical gold are going to eat up your returns. Luckily, if you want gold in your portfolio, you can buy a low-cost exchange-traded fund (ETF), such as GLD. Low-cost index fund? Is there an echo in here?

If you’re buying gold as “apocalypse insurance”… well, I figure if the apocalypse comes, guys with guns are going to come to my house and take my gold. Your mileage may vary.

4. Hedge funds

Chances are, you’re not eligible to invest in a hedge fund. In order to buy in, you have to be an accredited investor: show the SEC $1 million in assets or $200,000 in annual income, two years in a row.

If you are thusly accredited, don’t put your substantial wealth into anything as stupid as a hedge fund.

Hedge funds continue to enjoy a clubby, smoking-jacket reputation as the place wealthy people put their money in order to turn it into more money.

In fact, hedge funds are like actively managed mutual funds on steroids. They charge astronomical fees, trade often, and take huge risks.

This would be fine if they offered huge returns, but they don’t. The classic study of hedge funds by Guarav Amin and Harry Kat asks: Do the “Money Machines” really add value? Spoiler: they don’t. The study covered the bull market period from 1990 to 2000. In the decade since, hedge funds have done even worse.

5. Equity-linked CDs

Equity-linked CDs and other structured instruments (reverse convertibles, accelerators, market-linked notes, and other shiny things with fancy names) are designed to lure you in with the promise of high returns and no principal risk. You know, like a free lunch. What is it they say about free lunches, again?

“You never have to analyze any of these securities,” says Swedroe. “You should just run away from them immediately.”

Here’s a typical scenario: a bank issues a 5-year CD indexed to the S&P 500. The CD pays no interest until maturity (so only the principal is FDIC-insured), and there’s a substantial penalty for early withdrawal. If you look at the fine print, it says you earn 90% of any gains in the S&P. But not the final value of the S&P at maturity; it’s a value averaged from a few points along the way. Furthermore, you completely forfeit any dividends paid by S&P 500 companies, which you would have received if you’d invested in an index fund.

“Who issues these securities? Big institutions: Goldman Sachs, UBS,” says Swedroe. “What’s the job of the treasurer of that company? Is it their job to raise money at the lowest cost of capital or to do you a favor and pay you a high rate of return?”

Swedroe wrote about these investments in his 2008 book, The Only Guide to Alternative Investments You’ll Ever Need: The Good, the Flawed, the Bad, and the Ugly. No bonus points for guessing that they’re in the “ugly” category.

If you’re looking to share in some of the returns of the stock market without taking as much risk, you can do it without locking up your money for five years or more: put most of your money in a treasury bond index fund and the rest in a stock index fund.

Index fund, index fund, index fund. I’m even boring myself. I’ll console myself by going out to lunch and spending some of the money I’m not losing on “interesting” investments.

Matthew Amster-Burton, author of the book Hungry Monkey, writes on food and finance from his home in Seattle.

Related Videos

21 Comments so far

leave a comment
  1. Justin

    I like how half the articles on mint promote individual stocks and the other half are sane.

  2. Even the immediate fixed annuity may be a bad investment if you may need the $ quicker, or you can’t afford to have income.
    I’m glad I invested in some individual stocks in the 90′s, not so glad about others. Would do it again, given the returns.

  3. PsuedoNym

    I would revised the 1st point to be w/o due dilligence… While I agree most people won’t do the necessary work required and even if they do, they probably won’t make the correct analysis. However this makes it seem like some illegitimate product that shouldn’t exist.

    • Pseudo, stocks certainly are a legitimate product–but any financial advisor who recommends investing in individual stocks is making an illegitimate recommendation.

      The vast majority of individual stock investors who do “due diligence” still trail the market. One thing I didn’t mention in the column is that there have been several studies establishing that most investors have no idea how well they’re doing: they don’t know how to calculate their returns, and investors who think they’re beating the market usually aren’t.

  4. What are some recommended treasury bond index funds?

    • Look at the offerings from Vanguard, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, or (if you have access to them through an advisor) DFA. You can also buy individual treasury bonds through Treasury Direct. Disclosure: I own shares of VIPSX (Vanguard).

  5. viralviralvideos.com

    I love people like Kramer on MSNBC. If he REALLY knew what was going on, he’d put down his OWN money and be rich. But no he’s just an entertainer like Glenn Beck.

    • If he were to do that, it would be a conflict of interest and he could get heavily fined for it.

    • McShane

      What the user is saying is that if Kramer is so good at picking stocks he would run his own hedge fund (again) in lieu of a TV talkshow

  6. This is an incredibly irresponsible, uninformed article. Particularly in regard to variable annuities. Mutual Funds (the uninsured counterpart I’m sure you would advocate in their stead) have incredibly complex and unpredictable taxation that is often MUCH higher when all is said and done than your variable annuity when you consider NQ funds. Long Term Cap gains at 15% only tells a small part of the story. “Hidden” fees is laughable at best, as you must be assuming the financial advisor doesn’t impart the correct information to the client, not does the client read the corresponding literature to know exactly what they’re getting into. Are they suitable for a 30 year old? Nope. For a 60 year old trying to participate in the market (in the same kind of mutual funds that they would have sans-guarantees) and willing to pay just a bit more off the top to ensure a predictable stream that they can’t outlive, they’re an incredibly valuable component of your client’s portfolio. You’re not going to hit a home run with an annuity, but you participate in the large majority of the upside, with guarantees protecting you from the downside. Insinuating (actually, saying directly) that if the guarantees had to be met the insurance companies would go under is inflammatory and simply ill-informed. I’m starting to understand why you write from home….

  7. One more point regarding your mention that insurance companies would go belly up if they had to meet the guarantees. You also mentioned that annuities have low returns…

    Basically, a variable annuity with a living benefit tends to work like this: the client is either getting the market performance if its good, or a guaranteed rate of interest if the market doesn’t beat it. So if market returns in the funds the client invests in are great, then the insurance company doesn’t have to meet the guarantees; the market did the work for them. If the returns are low, then the insurance company has to “buck up” and match the guarantees that it issued. Again, I’ll come back to your points. 1) Low returns. 2) Insurance company belly up if it has to meet guarantees. And I will counter with my point 1) Those two cannot coexist

    • JO, what you’re saying simply doesn’t make sense. Nobody can offer a product where the investor participates fully in market gains with no downside risk. Any company that offered such a product would go broke. The upside gains you give up are priced into the annuity–and they are substantial. Insurance companies pay high commissions on VAs because they’re moneymakers for the insurance companies.

      Again, I’m not opposed to investing with an insurance company. I am a big proponent of SPIAs. But VAs are an expensive and complicated choice that hardly makes sense for anybody, except in certain arcane corners of estate planning.

    • I want to backpedal just slightly and say that there’s one other common situation where a VA makes sense: you receive a lump sum windfall that’s too big to put in a 401(k) or IRA, and you want it to grow tax-deferred for retirement. In that case, as Vanguard puts it:

      “If you don’t have a variable annuity, consider one if:

      “* You’re already contributing the maximum to your 401(k) and IRA and want additional long-term savings.”

      As with everything, look for the lowest fees.

    • Matthew,

      Instead of looking for lowest fees, look for best value. There are times when paying more gets you more.

  8. Mint, I am a true fool fan and can tell you your facts are way off. Did you compare the premium services, or just one of the 1000′s of daily tips they provide? Currently, Stock Advisor Performance (Total average returns since March 2002) is:
    David’s Picks: 80.5%
    S&P: 0.4%
    Tom: 40.4%

    I am 26, and I started investing on my own via single stocks within the past 2 years. Depending on the day, I average around 10-14% unreleased gains, day to day. Motleys services have trained me how to skip the middle man and get it done myself. I consider the learning experience a very valuable lesson in itself. Normally I love your articles but this one is just trash.

    • Jared, so what you’re saying is that Motley Fool publishes free, money-losing tips in order to show you how good their premium services are? This seems like an unusual business model. Welcome to my bakery! Try a free sample of our moldy bread. The non-moldy bread is $10.

  9. ETFs are all well and good if run properly, but there are rumors that current market silver paper is not adequately back-up by physical bullion. By the CFTC’s own admission, paper can be (and at times has) traded 1:100 against the underlying physical, basically fractional-reserve banking applied to precious metals.

    Only problem is that there is no FDIC to insure those deposits, and if silver is demanded for delivery they will have to either seek silver on the open market or resolve it with a cash settlement. Owning the physical bullion seems like a lot less risk to me.

  10. Actually, #1 and #2 are viable investment tools IF USED PROPERLY.

    When people ask me for stock advice, I simply tell them to buy stocks of companies they want to own with money they can afford to lose since stocks can go belly up, but I wont recommend one company over another. Note: I do NOT sell stocks.

    For VA’s, there are many that are bad, and a few that are good. I know of one right now that is a great buy…. for about 30% of eligible people. It does offer downside protection, all the gains, modest fees (no hidden ones), and is backed by the LARGEST VA company in the USA. As an added bonus, it has NO ANNUITIZATION requirement. For those that don’t know, you never give your money up just to have a steady income. Every other annuity I have seen requires it.

    If you are going to chastise products, don’t say all unless you’ve actually read all available ones.

  11. Richard, few VAs have an annuitization requirement. They may charge you a fee if you don’t annuitize, but only a tiny fraction of VAs ever get annuitized.

    Again, and this is to everybody: if you hear about a product that offers you all the gains of the market with no principal risk, run away. It’s a scam.

  12. Matthew,
    Are you a Certified Financial Planner?