How to Justify a $3,000 Coffee Maker

Share This
Photo: CoffeeGeek
Are you a coffee snob? Do you sniff at drip? Are you willing to endure a day of caffeine headaches and jitters rather than sip a subpar brew? And most importantly, is this addiction/affliction costing you more money than you can afford? These days a lot of people are telling you to get your caffeine fix at home rather than spending $10 a day at carts and counters.
“You probably stop at your local coffee shop at least once a day and grab your latte, cappuccino or Americano,” says sales manager Darren Ruffel of Whole Latte Love (WLL), a consumer-oriented e-tailer based in Victor, NY. He estimates, for example that if you average two venti mochas daily at $4.27 each, that comes out to $59.78 a week or more than $3,100 a year on take-out coffee, not to mention the cost of gas, parking and waiting in line.
“Your coffee habit is costing you a lot of moola!” he cries. WLL has definitely seen an uptick in machine sales since the economy crashed. “More people are investing in home equipment to save money and have good quality coffee at home.”
A shot in the dark
The heart of a gourmet coffee drink is the espresso shot, flavored with milk-stuff, sugar-stuff or spice-stuff or blended with ice or foam. It was Achille Gaggia who invented the modern espresso machine in 1938, which uses pressure to extract the best flavor and aroma from ground beans.
The signature of a perfect shot is the crema, the ephemeral golden foam of oils, proteins and sugars floating on the ebony slurry of extra virgin extraction. You only get that when properly selected and roasted beans are properly ground and pressed and then properly heated and pressurized water is forced through the coffee during the proper 20-25 second window.
How hard is it to get a professional-quality cup at home? “Not hard at all. With the right equipment, beans and knowledge you can create a great cup of coffee in your home—in most instances, a better cup than at cafes because you can customize your drink to your own personal tastes,” Ruffel says.
Types of espresso technology
So assuming that five or six cups before 8am will keep you going all day (really?), what kind of investment are we talking about? These days several categories of espresso machines have been especially popular: super-automatics, semi-automatics and single-serves. (Price ranges provided by WLL).
Super-Automatic ($499-$3299): Essentially a coffee-making robot. Put whole beans in the hopper, fill the water reservoir, and a superautomatic grinds and pumps perfect cups of espresso or crema coffee at the touch of a button. Then the mechanism expels the spent puck into an internal bin and readies itself for the next shot. Some have LCD screens or manual adjustments; many have self-frothers to foam the milk.
Semi-Automatic ($59-1999): Upgrades from the traditional pump machines. You’ll need to grind your beans first (use a burr grinder) and tamp it into the portafilter, but then the machine takes care of temperature and pressure.
Single-Serve ($89-499): A new market entry. These machines usually feature space-saving designs and deliver a single, precise extraction from an inserted capsule or pod. Many manufacturers also make tea, hot chocolate and flavored coffee pods.
Does it pay?
At my house we bought a Gaggia Synchrony Compact. Our preferred way to enjoy coffee is to express about 2-4oz of coffee and then add an ounce or less of milk or creamer to cut the acidity of the coffee. In Spain and Latin America, this is often called a cortado.
We paid $650 in 2005, so our beloved little robot just turned four. Over that time, this superautomatic has required very little maintenance and only weekly cleanings. It grinds and brews perfect cups of crema at the push of a button, and then cleans up after itself. After four years at an average of 5-6 cups per day, the machine itself has cost us less than 7 cents per cup.
Besides the coffee-maker, of course, you will be spending money on coffee beans. We use Peet’s Espresso Forte blend, which we buy fresh for $12.95 per pound. Using—believe it or not—the IRS’s estimate of 60 shots per pound, we’re paying a little more than 21 cents per cup. So for about two bits per cup, we’re enjoying the best coffee I’ve ever had anywhere in the world.
Compare that to about $1.45 for simple shot of espresso at Starbucks. If we invest the time in steaming some milk or adding a flavor, our investment only goes up by a penny or so. Compare that to Ruffel’s $4.27 venti mochas.
Coffee culture
Unless you work at home, this works best if you get your whole caffeine fix first thing in the morning. (Or maybe you need to invest in one at work too?)
But what about the social aspects of the coffee house? Dropping in on your crowd, taking a break from a stressful workplace? Coffee houses have become the quintessential “third place” between work and home, but Ruffell suggest that space has gone virtual, anyway.
“With the increased world of Web 2.0, we find that people are making coffee at home and sharing the ritual of creating unique drinks on social networks like Facebook, forums and blogs,” he says. “Individuals are spending more time at home and enjoying good quality coffee with neighbors and friends.”
Steve Barth blogs about work, play, society and politics at Reflexions.
Related Videos
Popular Articles

22 Comments so far
leave a commentThis logic is based on a fool’s mathematics. The majority of the costs that go into the prices you pay for espresso drinks at a café are labor costs — not the costs of coffee, not of the machine, nor even the rent.
Darren obviously didn’t go into accounting. Because if he values his own labor at $0 as he does here, then please — have him come over to my house and make all of my espresso drinks with my own home equipment for free. And yes, coincidentally, some of my home espresso equipment came from his company. So he should be well familiar with it.
People who follow this oversimplified logic unfortunately neglect to realize that humans are fundamentally lazy. We’d rather go to restaurants to pay people to make our meals for us. We pay people to do our oil changes. We pay people to clean our houses.
Too many people forget this part of the equation and end up far worse off than they started. They end up back in line shelling out for their favorite cafe as before — but now with an additional $3,000 hole burning in their pocket for a chunk of landfill gathering dust in the corner of their kitchen counter.
Oh I wholeheartedly disagree!
The ritual of making espresso is part of the fun. Its not just about accounting!
Its about making something, taking pride in it and also serving your guests and family.
Its too bad **some** humans are fundamentally lazy. I must be one of the few that would rather cook in my own kitchen than go out to a restaurant.
Why did you delete my deliberately rational and inoffensive comment just now? If this post was sponsored by Whole Latte Love and you do not want to hurt their potential sales, you should at least be honest with us and state that up front.
We didn’t delete your comment.
Nice article! You don’t really need to spend $3000. You could buy a decent burr grinder for around $150, make sure you obtain good, fresh coffee beans (or even better value, grind your own), and simply use the $30 Aeropress by Aerobie, which makes a fantastic cup of quality coffee for a very reasonable price!
Oops, I meant ROAST your own, of course.
Oops — I meant ROAST your own!
The unstated conclusion here is that Starbucks is selling you coffee for $5 that in effect costs $0.30 to make.
I’m sure “aficionados” would claim the exact same cup of coffee tastes better when it costs $5 than it would if it were $0.30 (same for the machine price).
Steve’s logic makes perfect sense – prepare your coffee at home and save a bundle on the cost of someone else’s labor. As Greg, the coffee shop reviewer states, labor is the highest cost involved. Put that money into high quality beans and equipment instead.
I prefer to buy my coffee even though I can make it much cheaper… the reason is of course that I’m single and making coffee at home is not really going to help that problem very much.
Not everyone who buys out does so thinking its cheap; it might be a means to one of many possible ends and well worth the expense.
“Steve Barth blogs about work, play, society and politics at Reflexions.”
Really??? Really???
Lets be a little more honest about these things. How about “Steve Barth works for a company that makes its money buy selling overpriced coffee makers which he has just been trying to convince you to buy”
That’s hilarious. The article is based on Steve’s personal experience and coffee jones.
Hmmm. Methinks if you’re the type of person ordering Starbucks Venti Mochas, as Darren uses for the base of his calculations, then you’re really not one who will appreciate the finer things about a fresh cappuccino pulled and prepared from a $3,000 La Marzocco espresso machine.
There, I’m done. That’s all I had to say.
Now thats just silly! Your logic goes like this – you are going to be drinking frufru coffee anyway, so lets just transform that vice into something seemingly legitamate. Huh? Its like telling someone its ok to buy cigarettes by the carton to save a few bucks. A $3000 coffee maker cannot be justified anymore than a $100 coffee maker. How about this, just stop drinking coffee! OK dont throw tomatoes!!! OK better idea, buy a $30 coffee maker and a $30 grinder and spend $8 a lb twice a month on starbucks coffee and you are set with your frufru coffee for years to come. Spend $4 a gallon of organic local dairy milk and $4 on a box of spiced chai tea bags and you are set for 2 weeks with chai lattes, assuming you have your own microwave of course. Still, none of this can be justified, if you are struggling to make your mortgage payments. I have an idea! Get a second job, pay all your debts, save the max, and whatever money is left over is yours to do as you wish, and then go ahead and go for the $4000 coffee maker because you’ve earned it!
Don’t go to a concert, just by the album.
Don’t drink at a pub, just buy a 6-pack and take it home.
Don’t go to the beach, just get a sandbox and heat lamp.
Don’t pay room and board at [your 1A school here], university of phoenix online.
We have a wonderful $1000 Saeco Espresso machine at home.
However, about once a week I might walk over to Starbucks and have a Cafe Mocha sitting outside (spring through fall only).
Very good concept, I like how you convey the message.
Like home-cooked meals, homemade drinks just taste better than their store-bought counterparts!
In other words, he’s spamming for his dodgy movie downloading site. And he’s spammed with exactly the same comment all over the web!
But wait — that’s also what this blog post’s author is doing: “Steve Barth blogs about work, play, society and politics at Reflexions.” Of course the link leads to …. drum roll please … his coffee-machine business.
Granted, there is a blog link at his store site. The posts are about…coffee.
Why does this matter? It’s a bit deceptive of Mint, as someone noted above.
Steve Barth is not in the coffee-machine business.
Wow, Eric, Adrian, I don’t know where you got the idea that I shill for a coffee company. It certainly wasn’t from clicking the link to my personal blog, Reflexions, was it?
And the reason this article is under Frugal Living is? Because of how much money you’re saving? Oh please.
You can’t justify a $3000 coffee maker as living frugally, no matter how high on the hog you live. Maybe you have the income that allows you to piss it away so easily, but for most people who visit mint.com, looking for insight in the Frugal Living section, this is not a fitting article – no matter what contect you frame it in.
This is just another indication of the type of society we live in today, and if anything, does a good job of highlighting some of the problems our country has.