is the best way to manage your money. Go there now »

Sign up or log in to mint.com

Fair Trade: 5 Things You Should Know

Share This

photo: jakaliefer

Fair trade functions on the premise that you, the consumer from an industrialized nation, wouldn’t mind paying a premium for goods made by local cooperatives in third world countries — not because the goods are superior to those that can be had elsewhere, but because you want to support these poor communities and be a better global citizen.

Over half of all fair trade organizations are in the Americas, with ones in Colombia and Peru heading the list. Statistics seem to back up the fact that fair trade works; according to TransFair USA, fair trade has produced about $200 million in additional income for farmer and producer organizations since 1998. It has also proven popular with the general public, at least in theory; polls show people believe that buying fair trade accredited products does more to help developing nations, in a more direct manner, than contributing to charity or relying on government aid.

As the fair trade craze gains momentum,here are five things you should know about it.

1- Fair trade has its origins in 1815 England

Fair trade as we know it dates back to the mid 1980s, but the economic principle derives from the concept of comparative advantage, as it was first laid out by Robert Torrens in 1815, and later, by David Ricardo. The driving principle is this: A country such as France, with a leading reputation for making wine, can produce a commodity, like grain, for cheap. But it can be to their advantage to trade with another country for grain if in trade they export wine (i.e. something that they produce efficiently) because when left to what it does well each nation, regardless of the differences in relative productivity, can specialize in their export, creating what economists term a comparative advantage.

2- Next up is fair trade apparel and cosmetics

While coffee continues to dominate (assuming as much as 40% of fair trade production), the year 2010 is certainly seeing the expansion of fair trade producer groups on the U.S. market. If the movement truly began with basic arts and crafts, its new direction is as varied as the countries and cultures hopping on the bandwagon.

For instance, over a dozen areas in the U.S. have earned themselves the designation “Fair Trade towns” by making fair trade products available in local stores, and by showing support from the local government as well as its citizens and local businesses (in California for instance, San Francisco and Chico have the designation, while the same is true for Burlington and Brattleboro in Vermont). Meanwhile, lines of fair trade apparel, linens and cosmetics have already been launched this year in an effort to meet the movement’s growing demand for fair trade products, despite the sagging economy.

3- Ben & Jerry’s will be fully fair trade by 2013

Arguably, because of its global omnipresence and because coffee beans are the flagship product of fair trade, Starbucks (SBUX) has seized much of the early publicity by becoming the largest purchaser of fair trade certified ingredients worldwide. However, they’re going to do have to do a lot more for the movement if they intend to keep up with New England’s Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. In 2005, Ben & Jerry’s became the first company of its kind to use fair trade ingredients, and they have committed to using only fair trade ingredients across all their flavors wherever they’re sold by 2013.

4- Accreditors constantly monitor fair trade producers

For a community of third-world producers, legitimate fair trade accreditation is a potential windfall. As we’ve seen in the hundreds of millions of dollars of additional revenue made through fair trade, there’s plenty of money to be had. And this money is earmarked for the community, helping to build schools, hospitals, homes — whole infrastructures even. But earning that accreditation — meaning earning the Fair Trade Certified Label — is not easy.

A number of criteria must be met in order to get the accreditors’ stamp of approval, including fair labor conditions for the community (defined as freedom of association, living wages, safe working conditions) and a democratically elected organization in each community deciding how to invest the revenues. Additionally, fair trade communities aren’t allowed to use certain pesticides and agrochemicals.

Staying true to these principles isn’t just verified according to the honor code; accreditors understand the enormous value of the label and are known to monitor these groups — as well as withdraw accreditation — if they suspect any form of abuse of the system.

5- Fair trade provides fertile ground for greenwashing

Not surprisingly, with the fair trade craze we’ve seen more than a few instances of corporate greenwashing, in which a company makes a minimal effort at showing some environmental sensibility in an effort to gain positive PR. Groups such as TransFair USA acknowledge the capacity for this kind of cynicism but also feel that they have the standards and practices in place to prevent it.

A prime example of fair trade greenwashing occurred in 2006 when Nestle, the world’s largest food conglomerate, launched its first fair trade product, an instant coffee blend it rather cutely called Partners Blend TM. The launch garnered this otherwise much-beleaguered company lots of good PR, but in reality the product represented a fraction of a fraction of its annual coffee imports, making it a token gesture at best — but one that earned the company the coveted fair trade label.

Fair Trade: 5 Things You Should Know provided by AskMen.com.

Related Videos

8 Comments so far

leave a comment
  1. Greg Loutsenko

    “…but the economic principle derives from the concept of comparative advantage…” hmm…no. i am an economist and i have to say that comparative advantage has nothing to do with fair trade

    the description of comparative advantage is this article is confused, so you better look it up on wikipedia for a full description.

    according to comparative advantage goods ought to be produced where it is most efficient to do so and then traded for other goods which were produced most efficiently else where. if farmers in certain places can’t make ends meet growing some crop that means the market is signalling that people do not want to buy enough of that crop at that price or quality. thus the farmer should move to another crop, which they have been doing in the form of growing drugs (but that is another story) or get out of the farming business all together.

    thus fair trade is just a way of encouraging people to pay what they don’t want to pay for something they can get else where for a lesser price. this is entirely contrary to first theorem of welfare economics, which says that pareto efficiency (a situation where no can be made better off without making someone else worse off) is achieved only when everyone optimises their utility subject to their budget constraint, ie getting the most bang for one’s buck.

    by distorting normal market forces, fair trade does not improve overall happiness of everyone.

    of course normal market conditions do not exist for agricultural goods. i must stress that fair trade is just a very small issue compared to the real evil of protectionism of usa and europe of their agricultural markets. all the import restrictions and export subsidies is what really preventing 3rd world farmers from competing with the fat lazy european and american farmers.

    • Rockportjack

      Greg, I don’t claim to be an economist, but I do have a college degree in the subject.

      I agree that fair trade can become an excuse for price fixing and protectionism. Greg has that right. He is also correct in pointing out that usa and european agricultural subsidies enable the export of ag products to 3rd world countries where they sell cheaper than locally produced ones – thus distorting the markets in these countries. The World Bank often participates by financing these purchases. But I think fair trade has legitimacy with the coffee trade. Climate conditions in the usa and europe do not permit growing coffee. Coffee growers need all the help they can get so they don’t turn to far more profitable crops – ie drug production. Coffee is a unique situation. I will continue to buy fair trade coffee.

  2. People buy this crap because they think they are gonna make a difference, yeah right! People will still be working for pennies for back breaking work regardless of long running gimmicks like this. Hippies will be the end of us as a species.

    • redneck

      The Chinese will always find a way to do it cheaper as long as the own the United States!

  3. Ethics Girls

    fair trade is simply a way of saying we don’t like the way that market forces work – why should the price of a crop be determined by the market traders in NY & London – when the price is not connecting to anything the farmer actually does – alot of the influence on price is because of how much stock the coffee traders are holding eg just in time stock holdings. why should the farmer not get a price that at least cover the cost?

    coffee farmers in fair trade coops are very marginalised farmers – they live in very mountainous areas & growing coffee is a cash crop that they can use as they don’t have many choices to make cash where they live. Partly this system helps farmers stay where they live & not leave their rural communities for slums – thus putting more pressure on the cities. their countries dont have minimum wage mechanisms, free access to health & education. where we are born is luck of the draw – if you are even a little bit protected from a western state system, then surely you can appreciate that fairtrade works as a safety net – however small that safety net is.

    incidently fairtrade does encourage diversification so that farmers can look at business development in their local regions.

  4. Charles

    Your first point confuses fair trade with free trade. The theories of Ricardo and others have always been in support of Free Trade. Fair Trade is a variant introduced only recently, and actually runs counter to the principles of Free Trade. One may be in favor of Fair Trade, or in favor of Free Trade, but they are not the same.

  5. Five interesting points about fair trade!

    We looked at the fair trade coffee situation in one of our daily polls at eZonomics and found the majority of our respondents would pay more for the assurance of getting a cuppa produced in a responsible manner.

    But watch where the profit is going.

    If buying a coffee in a cafe, economists warn a large part of the mark up could go into the profit for the shop. Visit http://www.ing.com/ezonomics/polllanding.jsp?left=false&docid=422902&poll_id=422902 for our analysis.