How Health Care Reform Would Impact You

Share This
Source:kokopinto
Health insurance premiums in the US have increased in cost by almost 100% since the year 2000, a growth rate three times larger than wage increases over the same period of time. At the same time, one out of every three Americans is uninsured, or underinsured. Moreover, health insurance premiums are more than double for Americans than they are for citizens of the second highest cost nation, Norway.
These daunting facts leave little doubt that health care costs in America have spun out of control and the financial health of each American, and the country as a whole, is dependent upon smart health care reform. What’s not as clear is the right way to go about it. Details on the health care legislation currently making the rounds are sparse and very fluid at this point, but we’ll try to dissect some of the basics and how the plan may impact you if it were to pass in its present form.
What are the basics of the Obama Administration’s health care reform legislation?
So far, this is what can be decoded from the constantly changing legislation.
- All Americans would be required to be covered by health care insurance – either through out-of-pocket or government subsidy.
- A new health care insurance exchange market would be created. You can think of this as a gigantic group plan, monitored by the government.
- You can keep your employer’s plan, if you’d like (and they decide not to drop their plan for the cheaper exchange).
- Insurance companies would be required to provide a basic level of insurance for everyone who signs up for the exchange. Premiums cannot be increased for those with pre-existing conditions.
When would the reform go into effect?
The Obama Administration had been leading a big push to get a health care reform bill passed quickly by the Senate. However, the details and resulting consequences of legislation of this impact have stamped out that possibility. On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced that the Senate will not vote on health care reform legislation by the August recess, saying that it is “better to have a product based on quality and thoughtfulness rather than try to jam something through,” as reported by the AP/Boston Globe.
Despite the delay, if the legislation were to pass later this year under the same timeline as proposed, it would go into effect in 2013.
Who stands to benefit the most from Obama’s health care reform?
It’s unclear how the bill will benefit the majority of Americans who already have employer sponsored health care plans at this point. In theory, premiums should be decreased because the insured are no longer footing the bill for the uninsured. The reform aims to immediately help:
- Those without any insurance.
- Those who have paid for expensive individual policies on their own.
- Employees of small businesses that have trouble affording the cost of joining a group plan.
- Low income Medicare participants who are left paying for whatever is not covered by Medicare for their medical bills and prescriptions.
Whether intended or not, the legislation could also mean more profits for insurance companies by making it a requirement for all Americans to purchase an insurance policy, be it by subsidy or out-of-pocket.
How much is this going to cost?
The legislation is expected to cost $1 trillion over 10 years. Obama insists that it would be revenue neutral, meaning that it would not be an expense added to the budget deficit.
Who is going to pay for it?
The entire tax burden is expected to be placed on the shoulder’s of the very wealthy. Originally, it was to come from a surtax on American households earning over $250,000 annually. However it was recently bumped to those earning over $350,000, and even more recently, those earning over $1 million.
What will happen to my doctor?
Nothing. You can still go to them, and they’ll still be living large in the wealthiest zip codes in your locale.
Who is opposing the present version of the legislation?
- Republicans: This goes without saying, right? Any new taxes on the wealthy or are sure to meet Republican opposition. This legislation is no different.
- Democrats: Wow, really? Yes. Some of the more liberal Democrats, led by Dennis Kucinich, have been pushing for the addition of a single payer option. The United States is currently the only high-income industrialized country in the world that does not have some version of a single payer, public health insurance. Single payer refers only to health insurance and payments for health service being funded by a single public fund. Kucinich and others want this option to be included in the legislation.
- The Obscenely Wealthy: More taxes means less luxury goods and $900 bottles of wine vs. $1,000. Can you blame them?
Where can I find out more?
The White House has created a public site dedicated to providing information and news on health care reform – at healthcarereform.gov.
For more of GE Miller’s writing, visit personal finance blog 20somethingfinance.com.
Organize your financial life.
Use Mint.com to see where your money goes, get bill reminders and alerts, track your investment performance, and find extra savings. It’s FREE!
Find Out MoreHow Mint Can Help
See Where You Spend
Mint.com auto-categorizes all of your transactions so you’ll always know where your money goes. Find out more »
Popular Articles

63 Comments so far
leave a comment-
dennis ely 101 days ago
like
-
David Colcord Anderson 53 days ago
3 likes
-
Maguire 46 days ago
like
-
rey 42 days ago
like
-
BryanLangen 38 days ago
1 like
-
Harry 29 days ago
like
-
Neville Coward 25 days ago
like
-
Karen Conine 21 days ago
like
« Previous 1 2The bestway for some might be to get rid of all goverment ran programs for all the old people and the politicians and pay down the war deficit Starting with medicare
let the people vote on reform or elimination
You lie! It is untrue to say the new system will be paid for only by the wealthy. There are steep penalties for any citizen that does not purchase health care insurance. There are no such penalties with the present system.
Mandated insurance is a gross violation of individual freedom and our Constitution. The leading promoters of socialized medicine would jail your fellow citizen for not purchasing insurance and paying penalties. Promoting unjust laws in the cloak of a so called just cause is a most despicable pursuit worthy of loud and angry condemnation.
Pity the poor explorers, adventurers, and pioneers that came to this continent without the assurance of “free” health care, like the indigenous that preceded. Those so vociferously seeking unearned services on the backs of the most consistently productive people in history act disgracefully and dishonorably, and should immediately retreat in shame.
To proponents of socialized health care,
If you have the work ethic to rival the regard in which you hold yourselves, a regard so high that you absolve yourself of fundamental responsibilities and make your personal health largely the communal responsibility of all, you likely have some means to voluntarily provide for your own care and possibly even that of a few fellows, without the need to tax others. You heap the plight of masses, often plights of a self-inflicted nature, upon those neither responsible for such calamities nor promoting the questionable behaviors that may often lead to ill health.
If you do not have the means to care for yourself due to disability, I wish you absolutely no insult nor put forth the notion that all disability is a consequence of ill living or poor choices of the afflicted. Additionally, I have witnessed repeated evidence that there are many disabled that strive mightily to provide for themselves, succeed, and often provide for others, even others most able.
To those seeking free or subsidized health care:
Exactly what citizens do you name as responsible for your increased state of need? Explain why your claims to entitlement are just, and why the compensation provided you should exceed that provided the average citizen traditionally?
How are you more deserving than your neighbor?
What prior actions have you taken as an individual to solve the challenges that face you?
Why did these actions fail?
If you are to receive the generous help of your fellow citizens, what will you do to acknowledge and repay this kindness?
What makes your participation in society a reward for that society, as opposed to being a burden?
Consider that the last is a question that may rightly provoke great fear in the mind of the individual, particularly when it is asked by government. Better for you, that this question be asked by those around you, those that know you, and your peers if you are an honorable citizen. Yet, you would further grant this pursuit of questioning the individuals’ worth to those that have empowered themselves to oppress us by strangling the public throat and raiding the nation’s wallet.
I’d rather avoid the mandated purchase of health care insurance and be labeled a CRIMINAL than submit to the tyrants pretending to champion the oppressed.
It is true that trying to push through a bill this quickly is risky and may be costly, but the need for a change in general is needed.
It is also necessary for changes to made within the medical industry itself.
Dr. Eva Mor is quoted as saying, “The administration of the existing health delivery system is bloated with waste and unnecessary cost. If information was shared by all providers of health services and all insurers by using computerized systems to store all medical records, it would cut costs and reduce errors that would save and improve lives.
What we need in a health system is uniformity in pricing for procedures and services and modalities of provision of testing and procedures for diagnosis and treatment. By providing coverage to the uninsured, which initially will cost the taxpayer, it eventually will save us hundreds of millions of dollars.”
http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107
She couldn’t be more right. The medical industry needs to be as much a part of health care reform as the insurance companies.
Healthcare reform is long overdue. This plan sounds like it will benefit America for years to come. Healthcare costs are skyrocketing and no one wants to take action. Healthcare for all would decrease the overall cost for those who have always been insured.
Get my jail cell ready. As soon as my free-market insurance premium rises due to government interference, I’ll be canceling my insurance and WILL NOT succumb to the government. Fine me… you’ll never get it. Put me in jail… you’ll be supporting me with three squares a day. Do you HAVE that many cells? Pass this (or ANY government intervention bill) and we’ll find out.
107 PEOPLE DIE WORLDWIDE EACH MINUTE.
THAT’S 153,000 DEATHS EVERY DAY.
HOW GOOD OF HEALTH CARE YOU HAVE WILL
MEAN NOTHING WHEN THAT DAY COMES FOR
YOU TO BE AMONG THAT 153,000.
ARE YOU A CHRISTIAN ON YOUR WAY TO
HEAVEN…OR ARE YOU STILL BOUND FOR HELL?
Healthcare the world over seems much more of an illusion, for far too many people that need it. My company http://www.smilemd.com is right now securing doctors and dentists for voluntary free clinics, for all those uninsureds throughout the USA, who still will not have insurance coverage, even after the dust settles on the great healthcare debate.
The irony of the issue that’s left out of these debates we’re fighting this very moment is that most people in this country die from viruses that are freely contracted. Whatever then will all your money buy you then?
I think the easiest thing for Congress to do, they can throw out all that paper work and stop fighting. All they need to do is put all Americans on the same Plan they are on. What do you think Mr. Obama? How would that work for you?