is the best way to manage your money. Go there now »

Sign up or log in to mint.com

Congress at the Cash Register: How Financial Reform Could Affect Your Shopping

Share This

photo: me and the sysop

Last Thursday, in a bipartisan vote, the Senate added a small amendment to the financial reform bill. The amendment, courtesy of Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), does two things:

* It allows the Federal Reserve to regulate interchange fees for debit cards issued by large banks. (Interchange fees are basically what retailers pay Visa, MasterCard, American Express and the credit-card issuers for the privilege of accepting a debit or credit card instead of cash.)

* It allows retailers to set minimums and levy surcharges on debit and credit transactions.

Yeah, my eyelids are drooping, too. But this is important: if Congress passes the full bill, which is likely to happen, it will result in more than tear-stained Armani suits. It will affect you every time you walk into a store. Here are five potential results.

1. Happier shopkeepers

Any merchant will tell you the same story: they’re being gouged by credit card issuers. “The banks just take more and more and more,” says Paul Dwoskin, owner of Broadway Market Video in Seattle. Credit and debit card transactions amount to 45% of his total sales volume, and every time he swipes a customer’s card, he pays about 4% in fees.

That’s higher than the average, which is closer to 2%, because a video store handles a lot of small transactions. But large retailers are just as upset. The National Retail Federation is a strong supporter of the Durbin Amendment.

When retailers face a higher cost of doing business, they don’t just get mad. They do something about it: raise prices. Which brings us to…

2. Lower prices

The banks claim that if Congress steps in and regulates debit fees, businesses won’t lower prices, they’ll just take bigger profits. To Ed Mierzwinski of U.S. PIRG, a consumer advocacy organization, this makes no sense. “Will they pass it along?” he says. “It’s an ugly competition out there. Consumers are going to choose the gas station with the lower price.”

When flour gets cheaper, bread gets cheaper. Same deal.

3. More cash-only transactions

As a customer, why should I care about a dustup between stores and banks? After all, I pay the same price whether I use cash, debit, or credit.

Not for long. Right now, a retailer who puts up one of those “$5 minimum for debit/credit” or “50 cent surcharge” signs is violating its merchant agreement with Visa or MasterCard and risks a threatening letter from the “Visa cops.” The Durbin amendment would change that. It would allow merchants to say, “Credit card? That’ll be an extra buck.”

“It would require consumers to carry cash at all times,” says Brian Tate of the Financial Services Roundtable, a banking industry group which opposes the Durbin amendment. “If you went to the store and wanted to buy a $3 gallon of milk, and the threshold is $5, you’re out of luck.”

“I don’t know of any other practice where any other business is forced to accept those types of onerous obligations,” says Mitch Goldstone, CEO of Scanmyphotos.com. Goldstone is the lead plaintiff in a class action suit against Visa and MasterCard over interchange fees.

Dwoskin, the video store owner, says he’s never required a minimum purchase and won’t start now. “We just make them feel guilty,” he says. “Some customers, when they give me a debit card for a dollar, I’ll say, don’t you have a dollar? Then if we get talking, I say, I pay over a dollar for this transaction.”

4. Fewer rewards

Debit card reward programs, financed by interchange fees, have traditionally been less generous than those offered by credit cards, simply because banks collect lower interchange fees on debit transactions. And if the Durbin amendment stays on the bill once it becomes law, these programs will probably be toast altogether.

And that’s not all. Some community banks and credit unions offer so-called reward checking accounts: use your debit card a dozen times a month, and you’ll get a high interest rate on your cash. That’s easy to accomplish if you can use your debit card 10 to 12 times on small purchases (you know, a pack of gum here, a soda there). But if merchants start imposing minimum-purchase requirements, what are you going to do? Go grocery shopping a dozen times a month? Keeping up with the requirements to get that high yield will become much more of a hassle. 

5. The end of the world

Okay, wait a minute. Let’s resist knee-jerk conclusions about greedy bankers and look at this from their perspective.

As a payment mechanism (leaving aside issues of credit card debt) plastic is awesome. It’s fast. It’s accepted everywhere. Cardholders are protected against fraud. And for this great innovation, all you pay is 2% on average–passed on to you by your friendly local merchant in the form of higher prices.

Is 2% simply the cost of a functional credit and debit card processing network? Is Congress’s meddling with the free market going to force us to melt down our plastic and live on cash, like in the Stone Age?

“The system the way it works benefits both sides,” says Tate, of the bankers group. “Merchants get more volume, and people come in and use their card for a multitude of purchases.” Allowing the Federal Reserve to regulate interchange fees, he says, would disrupt a system that makes consumers happy.

“This country has the highest interchange [fees] in the world,” argues PIRG’s Mierzwinski. Despite the technological advances that are driving down prices for numerous goods and services, interchange fees have held steady or increased.

“I used to charge $5 to scan one picture,” says Goldstone. “Today it’s about 5 cents because of technology. If I could go from $5 to 5 cents, MasterCard and Visa can do even better.”

If interchange fees on all cards are too high, then, why did the Senate go after debit cards – and not credit?

Chalk it up to the banking industry’s lobbying power. “I don’t believe they would have had 64 votes in the Senate if [the amendment included] credit cards, too,” says Goldstone.

But there’s more to it than that. As the text of the amendment notes, debit transactions are similar to checks. The interchange fee on a check is zero. Sure, businesses that accept checks accept some risks that they don’t face with debit cards. But they can’t negotiate interchange fees with the card issuers. It’s a take-it-or-leave-it contract.

Debit cards are our new cash and our new checks, rolled into one. They’re already more popular than credit cards. But the cost of using them is determined arbitrarily and opaquely by banks.

That’s why the Senate got involved. It’ll be a long time before we find out whether the retailers or the bankers are right about the results: Congress hasn’t passed the bill yet, and the Durbin amendment won’t take effect until a year after the bill is passed.

In the meantime, my debit card and I are going to buy a lot of $2 coffees. Sorry about that.

Matthew Amster-Burton, author of the book Hungry Monkey, writes on food and finance from his home in Seattle.

Related Videos

9 Comments so far

leave a comment
  1. ghostswg

    This is going to discourage credit card use – which is how Mint.com tracks transactions. If people stop using credit cards, their transactions will not be tracked automatically and then Mint.com becomes less useful.

    I would be very curious to hear Mint.com’s response to this movement. (One that I disagree with. Killing credit cards is not the answer and it punishes those who are responsible while rewarding those who are not.)

  2. This is fantastic news. If I can pay a lower price with a debit card or cash, I would. The only reason I use credit is for rewards, but I’m sure that the rewards don’t come close to making up for the price difference I would pay for cash/debit.

  3. ghostswg, are you arguing that the Durbin amendment will kill credit cards because retailers will be allowed to discriminate against them in favor of debit cards? They’re already allowed to discriminate in favor of cash. I’m not following your logic.

  4. Here in Canada, it costs the merchant 10-15c to accept a debit card transaction. No %. Fixed cost. Credit Cards are still a %.

    It’s because our debit card system is run by a non-profit company owned by all the banks (INTERAC). They basically charge enough to maintain the system. So if we can do it for 15c a transaction, so can the US banks…

    Also, our transactions are instant. I can literally buy milk at the corner store with my debit card and see it online 2 minutes later when I’ve walked home.

  5. Basic Economies of Scale those fees should be going down.
    Other countries have Interchange fees of a fraction of a percent.
    US banks does little to no “work” to facilitate transactions, all the “work” has been done – they are just collecting profits on a system that they have created.

    I’m not saying banks can’t make a profit.
    But they can take a hit when they us this type of logic:
    “The banks claim that if Congress steps in and regulates debit fees, businesses won’t lower prices, they’ll just take bigger profits.”

    2009 Total Revenue (according to yahoo finance)
    Bank of America: $150,450,000,000
    JP Morgan Chase: $100,434,000,000
    Wells Fargo: $98,636,000,000
    City Group: $3,984,800,000

    I know this is total revenue, not profits, but there is obfuscation as to how much money they “make”.

    I think it’s about time banks took one on the chin… we all know what that sounds like.

    -k

  6. Random

    I think you are too optimistic in your 2nd point. Retaillers have consumers that pay the current price, and most of them won’t change their habit and go somewhere else to pay a few dollars less. And no shopkeeper will lower their prices unless someone does else does it first. After a few weeks where nothing happens, they’ll happily continue selling at the same price to their same consumers.

    A real life example to illustrate my point: in France, the VAT was lowered from 19.6% to 5.5%. The effect on the price: nearly none. The agreement was that restaurant would only have to lower the price of 7 products out of ten categories (one entry, one hot dish, one dish of the day, one dessert, one entry/dish formula, one dish/dessert formula, one kid formula, one soda/fruit juice, one mineral water, one coffee/tea/herbal tea). So they just lowered the price on their 7 worst selling products, and keep the rest at the same old price.

  7. Wait, are you saying the French government told restaurants that they would have to lower prices on 7 out of 10 items? I hope that’s what you’re saying, because I never get tired of stories about wacky European market interventions.

  8. It’s already legal for retailers to charge customers for their interchange fees. And some disclose it at your point of purchase. So when I take my date out to dinner, I get to see the total for tip, tax and interchange. Suddenly I’m paying $50 for a $35 meal. Do I tip on the tax and interchange or just the meal? Oh wait… neither… the waiter just brought back my debit card because I didn’t opt in. I guess I have to wash some dishes!

  9. It’s already legal for retailers to charge customers the interchange fee and disclose it on the receipt. Convenience to the consumer will be lost if we decide to change our behavior to avoid the interchange fees and act like politicians say we’ll act. Here’s a scenario that WILL happen. I’ll take my wife to a nice dinner downtown and will be presented with a receipt for $75. After I notice that with tax, tip and interchange I’m basically at $95. Now realizing I didn’t opt-in for my debit card and I think my electricity bill will be presented at the end of the month, I decide to use my credit card from Wells Fargo at 18%. Guess who just made more money on interchange AND interest? The company who received bailout money to purchase my community bank and turn me down for a loan for my small business.